2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processing of titanium foams using magnesium spacer particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
137
1
19

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
137
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…values (E/E o ), where E o = 107 GPa from solid, fully dense Ti-6Al-4V tensile specimens, versus the relative densities for each EBM-manufactured prototype represented in tables 1-4 as illustrated in figure 26 results in values of n ∼ = 2.2-2.4 (equation (1.1)), slightly above the commonly accepted value of 2 (Gibson 2000). It is also interesting to note that, when the Young moduli in tables 1-4 are plotted against the prototype porosities (in per cent) (figure 27), the resulting curve complements prior data for porous titanium (Esen & Bor 2007;Erk et al 2008) as extended or extrapolated beyond 50 per cent porosity, but deviating from the Gibson & Ashby (1997) model and a similar model of Zhao et al (1989). It can be noted in figures 26 and 27 that the Ti-6Al-4V foams (table 4) deviate noticeably from the classic aluminium and aluminium alloy foams, but these foam prototypes have very high porosities in comparison (figure 2).…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Evaluation Of Some Materialise Sosupporting
confidence: 57%
“…values (E/E o ), where E o = 107 GPa from solid, fully dense Ti-6Al-4V tensile specimens, versus the relative densities for each EBM-manufactured prototype represented in tables 1-4 as illustrated in figure 26 results in values of n ∼ = 2.2-2.4 (equation (1.1)), slightly above the commonly accepted value of 2 (Gibson 2000). It is also interesting to note that, when the Young moduli in tables 1-4 are plotted against the prototype porosities (in per cent) (figure 27), the resulting curve complements prior data for porous titanium (Esen & Bor 2007;Erk et al 2008) as extended or extrapolated beyond 50 per cent porosity, but deviating from the Gibson & Ashby (1997) model and a similar model of Zhao et al (1989). It can be noted in figures 26 and 27 that the Ti-6Al-4V foams (table 4) deviate noticeably from the classic aluminium and aluminium alloy foams, but these foam prototypes have very high porosities in comparison (figure 2).…”
Section: Results and Discussion (A) Evaluation Of Some Materialise Sosupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It is depicted from this Figure that σ pl increases with increases in relative density and follow the power law relationship like other foam [2,20,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. The coefficient and exponential for the best fitted power law relationship are also reported In theoretical model, the value of constant 'c'& exponent 'n' are 0.3 and 1.5 respectively [34].…”
Section: Plateau Stressmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The porosity and pore size of metallic foam could be controlled by the control of amount of space holder material and its particle size of space holder [16]. Some materials like NaCl [17], saccharose [18], carbamide [19], magnesium [20], ammonium bicarbonate [16,21] were used as space holder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solid state method using space holder material which allows for simple and accurate control of pore fraction, pore shape and connectivity of porous metal is used in this present research. 8) Many different kind of space holder have been used to produce porous metal using this method, such as polymer, magnesium, 9) sodium chloride, 8) and ammonium hydro carbonate. 10) Solid state space holder method will produce two kind of porosity, macro porosity produced by space holder and micro porosity from the neck growing process between metal powders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%