2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.111727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ProCon: An automated process-centric quality constraints checking framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not all features are suitable for automated testing, and some still require careful manual testing evaluation by our engineers. This leads to the first major challenge: determining which features should prioritize to be automated testing by QA engineers (Choi et al, 2022;Makki et al, 2017;Mayr-Dorn et al, 2023). It's a critical decision that requires a clear understanding and strategic planning to ensure that the testing process is both efficient and effective (Chatterjee & Dethlefs, 2022;Fukuzaki et al, 2022;Mayr-Dorn et al, 2021).…”
Section: Company Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all features are suitable for automated testing, and some still require careful manual testing evaluation by our engineers. This leads to the first major challenge: determining which features should prioritize to be automated testing by QA engineers (Choi et al, 2022;Makki et al, 2017;Mayr-Dorn et al, 2023). It's a critical decision that requires a clear understanding and strategic planning to ensure that the testing process is both efficient and effective (Chatterjee & Dethlefs, 2022;Fukuzaki et al, 2022;Mayr-Dorn et al, 2021).…”
Section: Company Profilementioning
confidence: 99%