The Produce Contamination Problem 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-404611-5.00008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Produce Contamination by Other Wildlife

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common animal deterrent used was fences. Although the initial cost for fences is high, farmers may use fences because of their effectiveness and the long-term advantages in reducing recurring damages [93,94]. One of the issues reported regarding animal control was wild and/or domesticated animal access to production fields and water sources [95].…”
Section: Environmental Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common animal deterrent used was fences. Although the initial cost for fences is high, farmers may use fences because of their effectiveness and the long-term advantages in reducing recurring damages [93,94]. One of the issues reported regarding animal control was wild and/or domesticated animal access to production fields and water sources [95].…”
Section: Environmental Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the issues reported regarding animal control was wild and/or domesticated animal access to production fields and water sources [95]. This could be due to the lack of availability of deterrents that require additional money and maintenance [94], ineffectiveness of preventive measures used [83], and deliberately or unintentionally allowing of livestock or pets to the production areas without the knowledge that animal feces can spread human pathogens.…”
Section: Environmental Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leafy‐green industry continues to promote co‐management science because wildlife that use agricultural areas can pose a threat to food safety (Mandrell 2009, 2011; Langholz and Jay‐Russell 2013). The diversity of animals linked to food‐borne illnesses (Jay‐ Russell 2013, Erickson 2016) makes it difficult for growers to mitigate wildlife contaminations because there is no single solution to exclude all taxa from agriculture fields (Rice 2014). Therefore, science‐based co‐management that is site‐ and commodity‐specific can provide innovative ways to effectively reduce contamination risks while protecting wildlife and natural environments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%