“…While some have highlighted the relation between territorial stigmatization and housing markets (Schultz Larsen, 2014, 2018) or sales (Jensen, 2021), these studies have generally not had non-profit housing commodification as their main concern (see, however, Risager, 2022). If this is in part explained by policy development, it is not explained by a lack of theoretical and empirical inspiration from other contexts: a growing body of international literature argues that territorial stigmatization can be activated to provide moral and political justification for state intervention with political-economic effects on urban materiality (August, 2014; Gray and Mooney, 2011; Kadıoğlu, 2022; Kallin, 2017; Kallin and Slater, 2014; Sisson, 2022; Slater, 2021; Slater and Anderson, 2012; Thörn and Holgersson, 2016; Wacquant, 2008; Weber, 2002; for an overview, see Schultz Larsen and Delica, 2019). The 2018 ‘Ghetto Law’ amounted to exactly such an activation of stigma whereby non-profit housing commodification was not only justified but rendered necessary.…”