mitigating deepening global inequalities. As a result a range of institutions and individuals have become involved in studying, fostering and more recently critiquing the range of programmes and practices that can be swept under the migration-development nexus (Sørensen et al., 2002).
1Migration and development have long been interlinked Bakewell, 2007). In the fi rst half of the twentieth century, although most such discussions focused on the role of rural-urban migration in development, analysis of international migration and its developmental effects too were recognised in diplomatic as well as academic circles. In the 1950s and 1960s, in what some might call the heydays of developmentalism, treatises were written on the role of migration in development in a variety of locations ranging from Mexico (Randall, 1962) to Australia (Woolmington, 1958), Indonesia (Wertheim, 1959) to Nyasaland 2 (Van Velsen, 1960), to name just a few. Demography and economics were among the fi elds that retained a fi rm interest in the relationship between migration and development, but in most disciplines neo-classical theories of economic growth and the benefi ts of development were largely unquestioned. Interest in migration and development gathered pace through the 1970s and 1980s, but there was now considerable pessimism over the developmental impacts of migration as the developmental loss accrued by poorer countries through the emigration of the skilled, the lack of opportunities to use skills in the destination countries, and the limited impact of remittances on economic growth in origin countries all came to be theorised through the lens of dependency .In recent years several events have intensifi ed interest in the relationship between migration and development. First is the limited success of
ABSTRACTIn recent years migration has been rediscovered as a key intervening apparatus in facilitating development, offering a route to mitigating deepening inequalities. National governments, international funding organisations and diasporic organisations have all mobilised migrants to fund development initiatives in 'origin' countries. This has led to a range of calculative processes whereby some forms of migration and particular forms of development come to be visible, while others become 'invisibilised'. This paper explores some narratives of migration and development to illustrate how current debates on migration and development ignore certain scalar politics and specifi c temporalities, while scaffolding others. It suggests new ways of thinking about migration and development.