2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30793-6_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product Classification Using Microdata Annotations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Ristoski et al (2018) also used product images. The work by Meusel et al (2015) and Zhang and Paramita (2019) used product categories allocated by the vendors and embedded as semantic markup data within the web pages. To differentiate these from the classification targets in such tasks, we refer to these as 'site-specific product labels' or 'categories'.…”
Section: Product Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, Ristoski et al (2018) also used product images. The work by Meusel et al (2015) and Zhang and Paramita (2019) used product categories allocated by the vendors and embedded as semantic markup data within the web pages. To differentiate these from the classification targets in such tasks, we refer to these as 'site-specific product labels' or 'categories'.…”
Section: Product Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain techniques will need to be applied in order to compose embeddings for long text passages based on single words. For example, Kozareva (2015) averaged the embedding vectors of composing words from product titles, Lee and Yoon (2018) summed them, while work in Kim (2014) and Zhang and Paramita (2019) joined word embedding vectors to create a 2D tensor to represent the text. In the more recent work that uses pre-trained LMs such as BERT (e.g.…”
Section: Product Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations