2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product design and selection using fuzzy QFD and fuzzy MCDM approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applications of MCDM are numerous and it has been applied to human resource management (Shih et al, 2007), transportation (Tsaur et al, 2002), portfolio optimization (Ehrgott et al, 2004), product design (Liu, 2011), vendor selection (Shyur and Shih, 2006) and visual inspection (Verma et al, 2015). The most commonly used method for MCDM is Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of MCDM are numerous and it has been applied to human resource management (Shih et al, 2007), transportation (Tsaur et al, 2002), portfolio optimization (Ehrgott et al, 2004), product design (Liu, 2011), vendor selection (Shyur and Shih, 2006) and visual inspection (Verma et al, 2015). The most commonly used method for MCDM is Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zhaiet al (2009), the methods and approaches can be classified into two categories, namely the numerical methods and the non-numerical methods. The non-numerical approach, basically involves the traditional design evaluation approach which includes methods like; concept screening (Ulrich, & Eppinger, 2000) and concept selection and evaluation (Pugh, 1996), while the numerical methods comprises of methods like decision matrixes (King & Sivaloganathan, 1999), quality function deployment (Mariniet al , 2016), fuzzy set (FS) concepts (Aikhuele & Turan, 2017;Akay et al, 2011;Jenab et al, 2013;Liu 2011), grey relation analysis (Zhai et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Companies have to develop new products that meet customer requirements in a shorter time to improve their competitive advantage. Companies realize the importance of effectively translating customer requirements into engineering characteristics and quality factors that should be considered in product design and development H.-T. Liu [2], C.C. Otel [3], I.A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly, the result of market survey and linguistic variables used are imprecise or uncertain, usually resulting in biased analysis results. In order to cope with this problem, a number of scholars have applied the fuzzy set theory to QFD and developed various fuzzy QFD approaches H.-T. Liu [2]. The approaches contain conventional QFD computation using fuzzy variables E. Bottani, A. Rizzi [7], fuzzy tendency analysis X.X.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%