2012
DOI: 10.1021/jf303478y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product Identification and Safety Evaluation of Aflatoxin B1 Decontaminated by Electrolyzed Oxidizing Water

Abstract: In this study with aflatoxin-contaminated peanuts, the effectiveness of electrolyzed oxidizing water (EOW) in the decontamination of aflatoxin B(1) was investigated. The aflatoxin B(1) content was markedly reduced upon treatment with EOW, particularly with neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water (NEW). The conversion product of EOW treatment was isolated and identified as 8-chloro-9-hydroxy aflatoxin B(1) (compound 1), which is an amphiphilic molecule, in contrast to fat-soluble aflatoxin B(1). A mutagenic respon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the electrolysis, neutral electrolyzed water (NEW) is generated and it is stable in terms of loss of chlorine oxidants and ORP. Since NEW is non-toxic, non-corrosive and safe due to its physicochemical properties and a reverting capacity to ordinary water when diluted with tap water [17], NEW could be used for the application of safer, healthier and more acceptable methods for aflatoxin detoxification. Mounting evidence suggests that EOW has strong antifungal activity [18,19] and it is also effective in detoxifying AFB 1 in peanuts and maize [20,21]; however, there are some challenges faced in the development of this technology, such as the quick loss of activity in the presence of organic matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the electrolysis, neutral electrolyzed water (NEW) is generated and it is stable in terms of loss of chlorine oxidants and ORP. Since NEW is non-toxic, non-corrosive and safe due to its physicochemical properties and a reverting capacity to ordinary water when diluted with tap water [17], NEW could be used for the application of safer, healthier and more acceptable methods for aflatoxin detoxification. Mounting evidence suggests that EOW has strong antifungal activity [18,19] and it is also effective in detoxifying AFB 1 in peanuts and maize [20,21]; however, there are some challenges faced in the development of this technology, such as the quick loss of activity in the presence of organic matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between pH values of 3 and 6, HClO was the main form of available chlorine. As the pH increased further, to between 8 and 10, the primary form of available chlorine was ClO - (Xiong et al 2012). These results were verified by ultraviolet spectroscopy, which showed that at around a pH of 4, the absorption peak measured at 232 nm, regarded as the characteristic absorption peak for HClO, reached a maximum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The results of the present study have shown that treatment using AEW with a pH of 4.47 can reduce the counts of total bacteria, yeasts and molds, and coliforms significantly, compared with using AEW with pH values of 3.02, 5.58 and 6.51. Previous studies have indicated that the disinfection depends on the form of available chlorine, which is strongly influenced by the pH value (Xiong et al 2012). When the pH was less than 2, Cl 2 gas and HOCl were the main forms of available chlorine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to inactivate aflatoxin in products, several strategies were introduced, such as physical (Sun et al ), chemical (Xiong et al ) as well as biological treatments (Kim et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%