1989
DOI: 10.1021/ja00188a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product kinetic energy release distributions as a probe of the energetics and mechanisms of organometallic reactions involving the formation of metallacyclobutanes in the gas phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the second step of this process in more detail, metallacyclobutanes have been described as having three basic routes to rearrangement and decomposition: retrocyclization, β-elimination, and reductive elimination (Scheme ). , When the β-carbon is substituted, as in 1 , the β-elimination process is usually blocked, leaving [2 + 2] retrocyclization and reductive elimination of cyclopropanes as the dominant decompositionpathways. It was therefore surprising that the product obtained from heating 1 was the apparent product of β-elimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the second step of this process in more detail, metallacyclobutanes have been described as having three basic routes to rearrangement and decomposition: retrocyclization, β-elimination, and reductive elimination (Scheme ). , When the β-carbon is substituted, as in 1 , the β-elimination process is usually blocked, leaving [2 + 2] retrocyclization and reductive elimination of cyclopropanes as the dominant decompositionpathways. It was therefore surprising that the product obtained from heating 1 was the apparent product of β-elimination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 H NMR (400 MHz, C 6D6): δ 1. 64 (3 H, d, J ) 7.7 Hz, PMe), 1.57 (3 H, d, J ) 6.3 Hz, PMe), 1.29 (9 H, d, J ) 5.4 Hz, PMe 3), 1.26 (3 H, d, J ) 6.8 Hz, PMe), 1.08 (3 H, d, J ) 5.9 Hz, PMe), 1.06 (3 H, d, J ) 6.8 Hz, PMe), 0.92 (3 H, d, J ) 7.3 Hz, PMe), 0.34-0.5 (2 H, m, SiP 3 CH2), 0.2-0.3 (7 H, m, SiP3 CH2 + Ru-CH3), 0.24 (3 H, s, Si-CH3). 31 P{ 1 H} NMR (162 MHz, C6D6): δ 22.9 (ddd, J ) 24, 31, 40 Hz), 5.8 (ddd, J ) 25, 44, 324 Hz), -7.3 (ddd, J ) 28, 30, 32 Hz), -9.8 (ddd, J ) 23, 23, 23 Hz).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the barrier leading to (R)(RЈ)YCO is crossed, if excess energy cannot be channeled efficiently into vibrational and rotational energy as the complex dissociates to RYRЈϩCO, there will be a nonstatistical partitioning of the available energy into the products, yielding a P(E) that will peak significantly away from the zero of energy. 26 Several important factors likely contribute to inefficient energy randomization prior to CO elimination. Using RRKM theory for the YϩH 2 CO reaction, the rate constant for dissociation of ͑H͒͑H͒YCO to YH 2 and CO was Ϸ10 14 s Ϫ1 , which is greater than even the largest vibrational frequency in the complex.…”
Section: Translational Energy Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical simplicity of the lowpressure gas-phase environment and the possibility of separating solvent effects from intrinsic bonding thermochemistry have been key factors in making this a rewarding new area of metal ion chemistry. Established techniques for determining ligandmetal bond strengths include ligand exchange equilibrium, 5,6 bracketing by exothermic ion-neutral reactions, 1 metastable ion dissociation, 7 collision-induced dissociation, [8][9][10][11][12] and photodissociation methods, [13][14][15][16][17] as well as Hess's law calculations from independently determined thermochemical data. 1 A recent, promising addition to this array of tools is the kinetic analysis of radiative association reactions (the RA kinetics approach).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%