2001
DOI: 10.21236/ada388924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product Line Analysis: A Practical Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
41
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover none of them integrate the optimization of the three types of scoping. Regarding the five methods addressing the product portfolio analysis [20,21,12,22,23] only [20] also addresses asset scoping. Moreover as highlighted by J. Müller none of those five methods integrate market and cost perspectives which prevents any profitability consideration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover none of them integrate the optimization of the three types of scoping. Regarding the five methods addressing the product portfolio analysis [20,21,12,22,23] only [20] also addresses asset scoping. Moreover as highlighted by J. Müller none of those five methods integrate market and cost perspectives which prevents any profitability consideration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product line scope and product line analysis define the boundaries and requirements of the software product line, based on the business goals of the organization [Chastek 2001]. The scope identifies the characteristics of the defined systems as being inside or outside the boundaries of the software product line.…”
Section: Software Product Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature modeling within product line analysis captures the functional and nonfunctional requirements of the products in the product line and the decisions about common and variant capabilities and behaviors across the product line [Chastek 2001]. …”
Section: Software Product Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later in 2001 Kang et. al [3], proposed some guidelines for feature modeling. The authors made a distinction between functional and quality features and pointed out the need of an specific method to include quality features.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%