1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1991.tb00139.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product‐mix and Technological Change Within the Leontief Inverse

Abstract: Intertemporal differences in input-output coefficients can be attributed to technological change and to changes in the mix of products composing the aggregate sectors of input-output models. In this work, we develop the theoretical foundation necessary to separate these changes for both the structural and Leontief inverse matrices. Using this foundation, we examine the relative empirical importance of technological and product-mix change. The product-mix effect is then combined with RAS estimates of the techno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decomposition of CC is given by (see for example Afrasiabi & Casler, 1991;Rose & Casler, 1996;Casler & Hadlock, 1997) …”
Section: Downloaded By [New York University] At 03:47 26 May 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decomposition of CC is given by (see for example Afrasiabi & Casler, 1991;Rose & Casler, 1996;Casler & Hadlock, 1997) …”
Section: Downloaded By [New York University] At 03:47 26 May 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the form of the automobile production process were to shift radically in a complementary fashion with changes in product (alternative technologies) the findings of this report would be severely compromised. Alternative ways of examining technical change within the framework of input-output analysis are discussed in Craven (1983), Rose (1984), Davis (1987), Gowdy and Miller (1987), and Afrasiabi and Casler (1991).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Feldman et al (1987), in a study into the sources of structural change in the USA, found that the increase of output was mainly due to the increase of final demand and the changes in the Leontief inverse was relevant only in some emerging and declining sectors. Moreover, according to the study by Afrasiabi and Casler (1991) for the USA, the changes in the Leontief inverse comprised both technological change and product mix change, with the former being overall more relevant. Furthermore, as a driving force behind the changes in the Leontief inverse, technological change can decrease the input for final demand; that is, it can cause a decrease in the intermediate output thereby decreasing the total output.…”
Section: Leontief Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%