2014
DOI: 10.4236/ti.2014.54016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product Portfolio Management—Governance for Commercial and Technical Portfolios over Life Cycle

Abstract: Companies face an important question on whether they should allow product portfolio renewal to occur without interference by merely adding new products, or should the renewal be governed based on strategic and financial targets over life cycle? New product development phase is well covered in the product portfolio management (PPM) context, but later product life cycle phases are not covered well in this context. Neither are the different product structure levels adequately taken into account, instead the curre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning PPM, the NPD phase is relatively well-researched (Cooper et al, 1999;Kester et al, 2011;Hoole, 2006;Droge et al, 2012); however, the research is more limited concerning the remainder of the lifecycle phases. Only a few authors recognise the other phases in conjunction with PPM (Haines, 2009;Jugend and da Silva, 2014;Tolonen et al, 2014b). This study supports the previous studies with more narrow PPM focus but particularly provides a contribution to the wider consideration of PPM through the product lifecycle and product structure levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning PPM, the NPD phase is relatively well-researched (Cooper et al, 1999;Kester et al, 2011;Hoole, 2006;Droge et al, 2012); however, the research is more limited concerning the remainder of the lifecycle phases. Only a few authors recognise the other phases in conjunction with PPM (Haines, 2009;Jugend and da Silva, 2014;Tolonen et al, 2014b). This study supports the previous studies with more narrow PPM focus but particularly provides a contribution to the wider consideration of PPM through the product lifecycle and product structure levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Finally, because the business process management literature recognises the need for PPM and business processes alignment over lifecycle phases (Bai and Sarkis, 2012), the performance management dashboard connects the three key product portfolio performance focus areas (Cooper et al, 1999) with the business processes' strategic targets and KPIs. Implementing PPM governance model and ownership over all the product lifecycles and product structure levels are also seen necessary for effective PPM (Tolonen et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the previous research on product structures concerning commercial and technical views was studied by conducting a brief literature review. Then, the logic of commercial and technical product portfolios [7,10,[13][14][15] was adapted to describe a case product sold as a product-oriented, use-oriented, and result-oriented PSS. Car was chosen as the case product due to its comprehensibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, understanding the needed capabilities to deliver the offering is seen difficult [5]. Due to lack of mutual understanding of products within companies, there exist inabilities to assess the profitability of individual services [6], which hinders product portfolio decision-making [7]. To be able to compare different PSS alternatives in this regard, the offerings should be modeled in a way that they can be delivered repeatably in a systematic manner with minimum changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation