2023
DOI: 10.1257/mic.20200300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product Quality and Consumer Search

Abstract: An increase in quality shifts up the distribution of match utilities offered by firms and makes consumers pickier. The number of products that consumers inspect does not necessarily increase in quality. Higher search costs may lead to less quality investment, and the equilibrium price may decrease. If the equilibrium is inefficient, it is because of the inadequacy of quality investment. The market level of quality investment is excessive (insufficient) and consumers are too (little) picky from the point of vie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 3 This is consistent with the results in the existing literature, where a decrease in search cost boosts consumer surplus and welfare even when it leads to higher market price (e.g., Chen and Zhang, 2011;Bar-Isaac et al, 2012;Zhou, 2014;Moraga-González, et al, 2017;Choi, et al, 2018) or to lowers product quality (e.g., Fishman and Levy, 2015;Moraga-González and Sun, 2022).…”
Section: Endogenous Quality: Investment and Quality Reputationsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 3 This is consistent with the results in the existing literature, where a decrease in search cost boosts consumer surplus and welfare even when it leads to higher market price (e.g., Chen and Zhang, 2011;Bar-Isaac et al, 2012;Zhou, 2014;Moraga-González, et al, 2017;Choi, et al, 2018) or to lowers product quality (e.g., Fishman and Levy, 2015;Moraga-González and Sun, 2022).…”
Section: Endogenous Quality: Investment and Quality Reputationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…32 Notable exceptions: When a seller can manipulate the browsing cost of potential buyers, Taylor [2017] shows that a higher browsing cost can benefit consumers by driving away less-serious buyers while increasing the sales effort of the seller; while with endogenous market structure, Rhodes and Zhou [2019] find that lower search frictions can lead to a segmented market structure with higher prices and lower consumer welfare. 33 This is consistent with the results in the existing literature, where a decrease in search cost boosts consumer surplus and welfare even when it leads to higher market price (e.g., Chen and Zhang [2011]; Bar-Isaac et al [2012]; Zhou [2014]; Moraga-González et al [2017]; Choi et al [2018]) or to lower product quality (e.g., Fishman and Levy [2015]; Moraga-González and Sun [2023]).…”
Section: V(i)(b) the Case Of Experience Goodssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation