Product quality information in supply chains: a performance-linked conceptual framework applied to the Australian red meat industry

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>This paper aims to address the association between the quality and quantity of information in supply chains and the costs and benefits of generating, using and sharing it.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title><jats:p>The authors’ conceptual framework draws on multiple disciplines and theories of the value and use of product information. Controllable aspects of information, its quality and quantity, are the focus of the study as drivers of firm and chain performance. Structural equation models of constructs at two stages of the Australian red meat supply chain are employed, using data from a survey of 81 sheep and cattle breeders and commercial producers.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title><jats:p>Information quality influences performance more for some product attributes than others and is more influential than is information quantity. Information sharing for many attributes generates benefits only at high cost. Investment in measurement and transmission technologies is supported for intrinsic and extrinsic measures of quality. Differences in respondents' evaluation of information quality are interpreted as evidence of persistent chain failure.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title><jats:p>To the authors' knowledge, this is the first attempt at quantifying and comparing the benefits and costs of information sharing across multiple stages of a supply chain and the first to assess quantitatively the role played by information quality and quantity in generating costs and benefits.</jats:p></jats:sec>

The complex adoption pathways of digital technology in Australian livestock supply chains systems

“…Traceability and transparency facilitates trust amongst food buyers, manufacturers and consumers by way of understanding and guaranteeing credibility of provenance (Galvez et al 2018;Pearson et al 2019) with several issues at the forefront of concern: food safety (Zhang et al 2020), food security (HLPE 2020) and environmental impact (Macready et al 2020;World Bank 2021b). In more recent times, the benefits of such systems have been realised from a supply chain efficiency point of view; among others such as monitoring waste and environmental impact (World Economic Forum 2019).…”

Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in managing agricultural supply chain risk to counter the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Through efficient and quality information sharing, effective knowledge sharing can be gained to help SC become agile and dynamically capable while becoming transparent (Narwane et al, 2020). Information quality affects performance more of some attributes of food products, and information sharing benefits for some characteristics appear only at a high cost (Zhang et al, 2020). Inefficient and limited information sharing technologies and systems lead to information breakdown (Ojha et al, 2018) and can hinder the efficiency of multitier SCRM (Wang-Mlynek and Foerstl, 2020).…”

Embedding digital agriculture into sustainable Australian food systems: pathways and pitfalls to value creation

“…Data technologies were developed later in other livestock systems because of technical difficulties with fieldrobust sensors (Wathes et al, 2008). Recently, RFID technology has allowed producers to adopt robust sensors, which has dramatically increased data flow in many livestock systems (Barge et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2020). A range of technologies, including animal tracking (Barge et al, 2013), DEXA carcase analysis (Connaughton et al, 2020;Delgado-Pando et al, 2021), electronic noses for profiling of meat quality (Wojnowski et al, 2017) and blockchain technologies (Cao et al, 2021) are being explored to promote objective measurement and to stimulate information sharing throughout livestock systems.…”