2019 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccci.2019.8821893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Product Recommendations Using Textual Similarity Based Learning Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D. sha et al had proposed a fashion clothing feature extraction for analyzing various attributes, such as cloth pattern, sleeves, and collar using GIST, Fourier and Pyramid Histogram of Oriented Gradients (PHOG) feature extraction and experimented using the tmall fashion dataset with 8000 images [45]. In [46], the authors proposed a text-based image recommendation using bag-of-words and the Term frequency-Inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) approach to get similar product image recommendations. For this approach, the authors experimented on the amazon fashion image dataset and computed the Euclidean distance measure to fetch the top-N similar recommendations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D. sha et al had proposed a fashion clothing feature extraction for analyzing various attributes, such as cloth pattern, sleeves, and collar using GIST, Fourier and Pyramid Histogram of Oriented Gradients (PHOG) feature extraction and experimented using the tmall fashion dataset with 8000 images [45]. In [46], the authors proposed a text-based image recommendation using bag-of-words and the Term frequency-Inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) approach to get similar product image recommendations. For this approach, the authors experimented on the amazon fashion image dataset and computed the Euclidean distance measure to fetch the top-N similar recommendations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility functions in these methods obtain utility for each stakeholder from the top- n recommendation list (RL). Popular personalized top- n recommendation techniques (Hernando et al , 2016; Luo et al , 2012; Pujahari and Sisodia, 2020b) and textual content-based RS (Shrivastava and Sisodia, 2019) mainly focus on improving recommendation accuracy. The utility functions targeting only end-user preferences may achieve better accuracy but lacks novel and diverse item recommendations (Ge et al , 2010; Vargas and Castells, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%