2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and characterization of alcohol-free beer by membrane process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
48
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher retention of volatiles is obtained in this study with respect to our previous ones [13,14]. This improvement is probably due to the use of carbonated solutions as strippers which obstacle the mass transfer of volatiles through the membrane.…”
Section: Volatiles Composition and Sensory Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A higher retention of volatiles is obtained in this study with respect to our previous ones [13,14]. This improvement is probably due to the use of carbonated solutions as strippers which obstacle the mass transfer of volatiles through the membrane.…”
Section: Volatiles Composition and Sensory Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Therefore, in preliminary studies on beer dealcoholization [12][13][14], we used first water as stripper and then alcoholic solutions (permeates) obtained by previous dealcoholization process. This latter resulted as a valid alternative in order to reduce water consumption and minimize the environmental impact of the process, although a significant loss of volatile compounds was observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-alcohol beers are a good source of nutrients such as vitamins, minerals, soluble fiber, and antioxidants (Brányik et al 2012;Liguori et al 2015) and, therefore, recommended for specific groups of people (pregnant women, sports professionals, people with cardiovascular and hepatic pathologies, and people on medication) Sohrabvandi et al 2010). Also, restrictive drink/driving rules and religious concerns have contributed to increase the market of this beverage (Catarino and Mendes 2011;Sohrabvandi et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Physical methods for alcohol removal require considerable investments into special equipment, and they involve either thermal (evaporation or distillation) or membrane processes (reverse osmosis or dialysis). Thermal methods cause light caramel flavor and high volatile compound losses, while membrane-based processes cause less body and low aromatic profile of beer (Liguori et al 2015). Biological methods such as continuous fermentation, which uses special or immobilized yeast, are usually performed in traditional brewery plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the seven volatile compounds quantified in this study (Table 2), for the ethyl acetate, the evaporation was almost completed at the first 7.53% vapor fraction (Vf), correspondent with the average of % Vf at 15 min of the process (Table 1), in both samples and pressures (from initial values of 17.82 and 26.54 mg/L to 1.07 and 3.65 at 102 mbar; and to 4.09 and 5.18 mg/L at 200 mbar, for the samples S and G respectively), although for the 200 mbar pressure the evaporation seems more gradually. Table 3 Losses of total esters and alcohols in percentage (%) by different alcohol free beer production processes: lab-scale vacuum distillation (this work, present as the average of both samples losses), osmotic distillation (Liguori et al, 2015), vacuum rectification (Montanari et al, 2009), falling film evaporation, dialysis (Liguori et al, 2015) and reverse osmosis (Stein, 1993 Sucrose 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Ethanol 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000 −12.6000 −1.8000 9.5000 2.5000 2.5000 0.0000 −0.0503 0.0000 Ethyl acetate 0.0000 0.3000 0.0000 2.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 −1.8000 0.0000 1-Propanol 0.0000 12.6000 −0.8296 0.0000 0.9130 0.0000 3.0350 3.0350 0.0000 1.1919 0.0000 Isobutanol 0.0000 1.8000 0.0000 −0.7573 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Isopentyl acetate 0.0000 −9.5000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.0000 0.0000 2-Methylbutanol 0.0000 −0.3000 0.0000 −2.0368 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3-Methylbutanol 0.0000 −0.7256 0.0000 −2.0368 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2-Phenylethanol 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Water 0.0000 −2.5035 −1.8000 −7.0000 0.0000 −2.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Nitrogen 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1-Propanol was almost completely gone within the first of 10.52% Vf in both experiments and beers apart from the S sample at 200 mbar, in which its lost extended to a 14.43% Vf.…”
Section: Differences Of the Volatile Compound Profile During The Labomentioning
confidence: 99%