2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and metabolic effects of site of starch digestion in dairy cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
128
3
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
7
128
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On a net basis, AA removed by the liver are a major source of carbon for glucose synthesis, and there has been much speculation that increasing glucose or propionate absorption may increase milk protein secretion through a reduction in AA use for glucose synthesis that spares AA use for milk protein synthesis. However, to our knowledge, there is no evidence of an effect of increased glucose or propionate absorption on liver removal of AA (Reynolds, 2006b;Larsen and Kristensen, 2009), or an effect of increased AA supply on liver glucose synthesis (Reynolds, 2006b). However, the primary gluconeogenic AA in the liver are non-EAA, and therefore any sparing of these AA from glucose synthesis would be unlikely to increase the supply of EAA to the mammary gland.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Efficiency Of N Utilization In The Pdvmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On a net basis, AA removed by the liver are a major source of carbon for glucose synthesis, and there has been much speculation that increasing glucose or propionate absorption may increase milk protein secretion through a reduction in AA use for glucose synthesis that spares AA use for milk protein synthesis. However, to our knowledge, there is no evidence of an effect of increased glucose or propionate absorption on liver removal of AA (Reynolds, 2006b;Larsen and Kristensen, 2009), or an effect of increased AA supply on liver glucose synthesis (Reynolds, 2006b). However, the primary gluconeogenic AA in the liver are non-EAA, and therefore any sparing of these AA from glucose synthesis would be unlikely to increase the supply of EAA to the mammary gland.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Efficiency Of N Utilization In The Pdvmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The observation that gut enterocytes use glucose, the acidic AA (Glu, Asp) and Gln as energy substrates has fuelled speculation that providing more glucose for absorption in the small intestine would spare AA, increasing their absorption into blood, and thus their availability for milk protein synthesis. However, there is no evidence of which we are aware that increased intestinal starch or glucose supply increases net PDV appearance of AA in lactating dairy cows (Reynolds, 2006b;Larsen and Kristensen, 2009), and it is unlikely that any effects would extend beyond the utilization of non-EAA.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Efficiency Of N Utilization In The Pdvmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, the degradation of maize starch may be so slow that it does not completely undergo fermentation in the rumen (McCarthy et al, 1989) and is instead digested post-ruminally or excreted in faeces. If digested in the small intestine, it would increase its efficiency as a source of energy for milk production (Reynolds, 2006). Previous studies have reported that feeding maize-based concentrates resulted in greater dry matter intake (DMI) than barley-based concentrates for alfalfa-and maize silage-based diets (McCarthy et al, 1989;Overton et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported that feeding maize-based concentrates resulted in greater dry matter intake (DMI) than barley-based concentrates for alfalfa-and maize silage-based diets (McCarthy et al, 1989;Overton et al, 1995). The importance of the interactions between qualities of fibre and starch in studies of intake regulation has been highlighted in a review of Reynolds (2006), suggesting that the positive interactions may result in improved DMI and animal performance in terms of milk production (Dixon and Stockdale, 1999). Despite the expected beneficial effects on intake and performance, few studies have been reported in which the interaction effects between concentrate starch source and forage digestibility have been examined when fast-degrading starch from barley was replaced with slow-degrading starch from maize in high or medium digestibility grass silage-based diets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation