1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0095-4470(95)80162-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production and perception of rhetoricalquestions in Osaka Japanese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced pitch range associated with lesser vocal effort, then, signals lesser speaker involvment or emotional disengagement. Previous studies have documented the manipulation of global pitch range as a linguistic device to differentiate such meanings as the "incredulity" versus the "uncertainty" interpretation of contour type 2 of our first corpus [16] and incredulous rhetorical versus unmarked yes-no question intrepretations of sentence final rising configurations [8,17]. Our results suggest that final lowering is a shorter term use of this same device.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The reduced pitch range associated with lesser vocal effort, then, signals lesser speaker involvment or emotional disengagement. Previous studies have documented the manipulation of global pitch range as a linguistic device to differentiate such meanings as the "incredulity" versus the "uncertainty" interpretation of contour type 2 of our first corpus [16] and incredulous rhetorical versus unmarked yes-no question intrepretations of sentence final rising configurations [8,17]. Our results suggest that final lowering is a shorter term use of this same device.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Jun & Oh (1994) show that in Korean, although not all speakers use the same strategy for expressing incredulity, larger pitch range is one of the factors manipulated to distinguish between incredulity questions and wh-questions. Miura & Hara (1995) show that in Osaka Japanese, sentence-initial FO lowering and sentence-final FO raising are some of the characteristics of rhetorical questions, which express disbelief or incredulity.…”
Section: What Does Final Lowering Mean?mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The reduced pitch range associated with lesser vocal effort, then, signals lesser speaker involvment or emotional disengagement. Previous studies have documented the manipulation of global pitch range as a linguistic device to differentiate such meanings as the "incredulity" versus the "uncertainty" interpretation of contour type 2 of our first corpus [16] and incredulous rhetorical versus unmarked yes-no question intrepretations of sentence final rising configurations [8,17]. Our results suggest that final lowering is a shorter term use of this same device.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%