1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00036606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production by Hexagenia limbata in a warm-water reservoir and its association with chlorophyll content of the water column

Abstract: We investigated the productivity of nymphs of the mayfly Hexagenia limbata in Lake Waco, a central Texas reservoir, and assessed its association with chlorophyll content of the water . We hypothesized that food availability measured as chlorophyll content of the water may directly associate with growth of Hexagenia and predict population productivity. To test this, we compared production by mayfly populations at two stations in the same reservoir ; a northern station receiving water input with high chlorophyll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H. limbata required 2,588 degree ), and annual production to mean biomass ratios (P/ B) for Hexagenia limbata from eight locations across Eastern North America (modified from Giberson and Rosenberg 1994 4.1-4.6 3.8-3.9 6.1-7.5 3.5-5.4 2.7 2.1 ND ND Lobinske et al (1996) present study Welch and Vodopich (1989) Horst and Marzolf (1975) Hudson and Swanson (1972 Rikilik and Momot (1982) Heise et al (1987) Giberson andRosenberg (1994) days (dd) to develop to emergence based on laboratory rearing with temperature regimes from 6 to 26ЊC, and based on a minimum threshold of 10ЊC (McCafferty and Pereira 1984). In the Lower Mobile River, nymphs accumulated ϳ3,250 dd for emergence (based on daily temperatures from 23 September 1995 to 6 September 1996) in a thermal regime from ϳ5 to 32ЊC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…H. limbata required 2,588 degree ), and annual production to mean biomass ratios (P/ B) for Hexagenia limbata from eight locations across Eastern North America (modified from Giberson and Rosenberg 1994 4.1-4.6 3.8-3.9 6.1-7.5 3.5-5.4 2.7 2.1 ND ND Lobinske et al (1996) present study Welch and Vodopich (1989) Horst and Marzolf (1975) Hudson and Swanson (1972 Rikilik and Momot (1982) Heise et al (1987) Giberson andRosenberg (1994) days (dd) to develop to emergence based on laboratory rearing with temperature regimes from 6 to 26ЊC, and based on a minimum threshold of 10ЊC (McCafferty and Pereira 1984). In the Lower Mobile River, nymphs accumulated ϳ3,250 dd for emergence (based on daily temperatures from 23 September 1995 to 6 September 1996) in a thermal regime from ϳ5 to 32ЊC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because Ephemeroptera are sensitive taxa, they may be disproportionately affected by higher chlorophyll- a levels. Additionally, high levels of Chlorophyll- a reduces mayfly secondary production [49], which would possibly further reduce their presence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All feeding and growth and most natural population controls on Hexagenia limbata occur during the aquatic nymphal stage (Horst 1976). They are a valuable food source for secondary consumers during this stage in the life cycle, which can be as long as two years (Welch and Vodopich 1989). The H. limbata populations in northern Lake Huron have a two-year life cycle (Schloesser and Hiltunen 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%