2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production data analysis of tight gas condensate reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future production profiles and estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of shale gas wells are obtained by such methods as reservoir simulation [2], hydraulic fracturing modeling, rate transient analysis (RTA), and decline curve analysis (DCA). However, the reservoir simulation implies high uncertainty in representing flow behavior due to reservoir properties, complexity of reservoir, absorption or desorption flow, and variation of fracture permeability [3][4][5][6][7]. It is a time-consuming and a challenge task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future production profiles and estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of shale gas wells are obtained by such methods as reservoir simulation [2], hydraulic fracturing modeling, rate transient analysis (RTA), and decline curve analysis (DCA). However, the reservoir simulation implies high uncertainty in representing flow behavior due to reservoir properties, complexity of reservoir, absorption or desorption flow, and variation of fracture permeability [3][4][5][6][7]. It is a time-consuming and a challenge task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases where these two compressibilities are comparable, one should account for pressure support from rock compressibility in the material-balance equation, as well. The average pressure in the DOI tends to be a constant value for constant flowing pressure, as demonstrated in the work of Behmanesh et al (2015b). This observation is fundamentally based on a mathematical derivation.…”
Section: Appendix A: Determination Of Doi Maximummentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The data form a straight line after 100 days of production, indicating that linear flow is the dominant flow regime. Using the slope of the plot and the appropriate equation for gas/condensate reservoirs (Behmanesh et al 2015b), the total x f ffiffi ffi k p is calculated (the sum of x f ffiffi ffi k p from each stage) to be 21.5 ftÁmd 0.5 from the unit impulse method. The x f ffiffi ffi k p calculated from Wattenbarger's DOI formulation and transient/ boundary-dominated flow intersection method DOI are 20.1 ftÁmd 0.5 (6% error with respect to unit impulse method) and 18.9 ftÁmd 0.5 (12% error with respect to unit impulse method), respectively.…”
Section: Discussion: Impact Of Doi Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus of this paper was on modeling of capacitance and resistance for the single-phase fluid systems. However, the approach can be extended for multiphase flow situations by employing proper pseudo variable (Behmanesh et al, 2015) definitions to linearize the equations. Therefore the single-phase liquid analogy can still be applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%