2001
DOI: 10.1089/152045501300189312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of Cloned Goats from Enucleated Oocytes Injected with Cumulus Cell Nuclei or Fused with Cumulus Cells

Abstract: This study was designed to produce cloned goats from cumulus cells. Cloning donor nuclei were from cumulus cells either freshly isolated or cultured in vitro. Enucleated oocytes were either injected with cumulus cell nuclei without piezo-driven manipulator (injection method) or fused with cumulus cells (fusion method). The survival rate of cloned embryos, obtained by injection, was higher than that derived from fusion (62.7 and 45.9%, respectively). Two cloned goats were derived by fusion with in vitro culture… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The morula/blastocyst rate was low in both treatment groups (in 9.5% ionomycin and 5.9% ethanol groups) under our conditions, and the rate was much lower than that (34.4%) previously reported by Zou et al [31] when used in in-vivo matured cytoplasts as recipients and NT embryos cultured in vivo for 6 d. In the case of the ionomycin group, the rate was also much lower than that previously reported by Chesne et al [6], who used in vivo matured oocytes as recipient cytoplasts. This may be due to the in vivo conditions offering a better environment than the in vitro.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The morula/blastocyst rate was low in both treatment groups (in 9.5% ionomycin and 5.9% ethanol groups) under our conditions, and the rate was much lower than that (34.4%) previously reported by Zou et al [31] when used in in-vivo matured cytoplasts as recipients and NT embryos cultured in vivo for 6 d. In the case of the ionomycin group, the rate was also much lower than that previously reported by Chesne et al [6], who used in vivo matured oocytes as recipient cytoplasts. This may be due to the in vivo conditions offering a better environment than the in vitro.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In addition, and again in contrast to conventional micromanipulation, piezo permits multiple procedures to be performed with a single needle. Thus, although many oocytes (such as those of humans, cattle, pigs and rabbits) can be injected conventionally, the relative speed and ease of piezo means that it is advantageous even in these species 3,[15][16][17][18][19][20] . Ease of pipette fabrication (beveled tips are not required) and speed also make piezo suitable for the injection of blastocysts with ES cells 11 , and the method additionally allows partial ablation of the inner cell mass (i.e., the removal of potentially competing embryonic cells).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neste sentido, vários estudos já foram desenvolvidos buscando avaliar o estádio nuclear adequado deste citoplasto receptor em programas de transferência nuclear. Contudo, diferentes estudos têm demonstrado que oócitos em metáfase II (MII) são mais adequados para suportar a reprogramação nuclear São comparados aos demais estádios de maturação nuclear (Zou et al, 2001;Lee et al, 2007). Por esta razão, a maioria das pesquisas relata o uso de oócitos em MII maturados in vivo (Kato et al, 2000) ou in vitro (Zhou et al, 2007).…”
Section: Seleção De Oócitos Receptoresunclassified