2012
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2012-20753-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of collimated positronium by positron scattering from CO2, N2 and Xe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where N Ps corresponds to the Ps counts, N + to that for positrons entering the production cell, S = exp(−t/τ Ps ) is the Ps fraction that reaches the detector in time t, and η Ps and η + are the detection efficiencies for Ps atoms and positrons, respectively, the ratio η + /η Ps having been found to be approximately constant across different detectors and over long periods of time [17]. In terms of the total cross sections for positrons and Ps (Q + T and Q Ps T , respectively), the production efficiency may be expressed as:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…where N Ps corresponds to the Ps counts, N + to that for positrons entering the production cell, S = exp(−t/τ Ps ) is the Ps fraction that reaches the detector in time t, and η Ps and η + are the detection efficiencies for Ps atoms and positrons, respectively, the ratio η + /η Ps having been found to be approximately constant across different detectors and over long periods of time [17]. In terms of the total cross sections for positrons and Ps (Q + T and Q Ps T , respectively), the production efficiency may be expressed as:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production efficiency from O 2 was investigated at twelve Ps energies between 10.5 and 399 eV. Figure 1 shows the present results for O 2 as a function of pressure in comparison to those for H 2 [13,17,21], N 2 [13,17,21], Ar [13] and CO 2 [17] ( Ps for each data set has been corrected for the detector solid angle and in-flight annihilation as in Eq. (1), but uncorrected for the final term, η+ ηPs ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations