2006
DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.01095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of horse foals via direct injection of roscovitine-treated donor cells and activation by injection of sperm extract

Abstract: We evaluated the effects of different donor cell treatments and activation methods on production of blastocysts after equine nuclear transfer. Nuclear transfer was performed by direct injection of donor cells, using a piezo drill, and standard activation was by injection of sperm factor followed by culture with 6-dimethylaminopurine. There was no difference in blastocyst development between embryos produced with roscovitine-treated or confluent donor cells (3.6% for either treatment). Addition of injection of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
44
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow cytometry showed that roscovitine treatment could not increase the proportion of cells arrested at the G0/G1 phase in comparison with the control group. These results are in agreement with those of Hinrichs et al (2006) who reported that roscovitine treatment did not significantly affect the proportion of horse cells in the G0/G1 phase. In contrast, Gómez et al (2003) showed that fibroblast cells from skin tissues of the domestic cat could be synchronised to the G0/G1 phase by roscovitine treatment as compared to cycling cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Flow cytometry showed that roscovitine treatment could not increase the proportion of cells arrested at the G0/G1 phase in comparison with the control group. These results are in agreement with those of Hinrichs et al (2006) who reported that roscovitine treatment did not significantly affect the proportion of horse cells in the G0/G1 phase. In contrast, Gómez et al (2003) showed that fibroblast cells from skin tissues of the domestic cat could be synchronised to the G0/G1 phase by roscovitine treatment as compared to cycling cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Reported equine NT blastocyst development rates, including those from our laboratory, have ranged from 3 to 10% (Galli et al 2003, Lagutina et al 2005, Hinrichs et al 2006. In contrast, equine blastocyst development after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) of oocytes in our laboratory is typically 25-35% (Hinrichs et al 2005, Choi et al 2006a, 2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Currently, only four viable horse foals resulting from adult somatic cell NT have been reported in the literature (Galli et al 2003, Lagutina et al 2005, Hinrichs et al 2006, and three mule foals have been produced from NT using fetal cells (Woods et al 2003, Vanderwall et al 2004a. As in other species, the rate of pregnancy loss in the horse after transfer of NT embryos has been high in most reports (75-100% of established pregnancies; Galli et al 2003, Woods et al 2003, Vanderwall et al 2004b, Lagutina et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…penetration of the zona or the capsule with the Piezo drill, was based on our previous work using the drill for ICSI and nuclear transfer (Choi et al 2004, Hinrichs et al 2006. It appeared to result in less damage to the embryo than did microblade dissection, as reported previously in the horse and other species (Huhtinen et al 1997, Hasler et al 2002, El-Gayar & Holtz 2005.…”
Section: Primer Set Sequencementioning
confidence: 96%