1989
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(89)90850-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of intense polarized hydrogen atomic beams by cooling the atoms to low temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond some point, the benefit of low beam temperature is offset by increased scattering losses and deteriorating degree of dissociation at a low nozzle temperature. A nozzle temperature of 65-80 K is common [198,202,217], but a temperature of 35 K with correspondingly reduced gas throughput (scattering losses) has been used for applications where beam density rather than intensity was of primary interest [33,45,57,89,189].…”
Section: Beam-forming Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beyond some point, the benefit of low beam temperature is offset by increased scattering losses and deteriorating degree of dissociation at a low nozzle temperature. A nozzle temperature of 65-80 K is common [198,202,217], but a temperature of 35 K with correspondingly reduced gas throughput (scattering losses) has been used for applications where beam density rather than intensity was of primary interest [33,45,57,89,189].…”
Section: Beam-forming Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is good evidence that condensation of water vapour on the nozzle reduces surface recombination. For very cold nozzles (35 K), the large decrease in α for nozzle temperatures below ∼70 K can be alleviated by addition of N 2 [189].…”
Section: Abs For H and Dmentioning
confidence: 99%