2013
DOI: 10.1080/19476337.2013.781681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of low-fiber sunflower (Helianthus annuusL.) meal by micronization and air classification processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem may be overcome by reducing the fiber content of SFM. Some promising results have been reported when meals are heat treated (Laudadio and Tufarelli, 2010b), pin-milled (Wu and Nichols, 2005) or air classified (Laudadio et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This problem may be overcome by reducing the fiber content of SFM. Some promising results have been reported when meals are heat treated (Laudadio and Tufarelli, 2010b), pin-milled (Wu and Nichols, 2005) or air classified (Laudadio et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The two dietary protein sources evaluated were soybean meal (SBM; 44% CP) and micronized-air classified sunflower meal (SFM; Heliantus annuus L.) having 42% CP and 2.4% crude fiber as reported by Laudadio et al (2013). The major grain energy source for both diets, wheat middlings, was obtained from durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.…”
Section: Preparation Of Feed Ingredientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using another processing system compromised of micronization and air classification stages, a protein-rich fraction containing 38.2% protein and 2.4% fiber was produced from sunflower meal with an original content of 34% protein and 14.5% fiber (Laudadio et al, 2013). Air classification technology of flour requires large and expensive equipment and provides poor classification efficiency due to the adhesion of small protein particles to the larger starch granules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certain drop in dietary fibres for samples supplemented with fine particles (12.69%), in comparison to medium and coarse sizes (14.78%) was observed. It is plausible to suggest that the use of flour with coarse particles better corresponds to more functional compounds, such as dietary fibres [25]. Table 3 also reports the results of the in vitro starch digestibility.…”
Section: Step 2 Effects Of Tomato Peels Particles Size On Spaghetti Qmentioning
confidence: 79%