Production of short-pulsed beam for ion-beam pulse radiolysis

Noda, K.; Tann, D.; Uesugi, T.; Shibuya, S.; Honma, T.; Hashimoto, Y.

doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2005.06.080

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The bulk of the radiolysis products are formed or annihilated outside of the spurs over much longer timeframes (10 −12 s to 10 −1 s). The G-values for many of the primary radiolytic species can be measured using pulse radiolysis methods [47,48,51,58,67,[69][70][71]86,[109][110][111][112]115,118,124,125,130,135,139,145,[148][149][150]169,170,173,174,177,178,[180][181][182][183][194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201][202][203]210], including the more recently developed nanosecond to sub-nanosecond [71,150,173,…”

Section: Past Radiolysis Modeling Of Fission Reactor Coolant Circuitsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Critical Review of Radiolysis Issues in Water-Cooled Fission and Fusion Reactors: Part I, Assessment of Radiolysis Models

Macdonald

Engelhardt

Petrov

2022

CMD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A critical review is presented on modeling of the radiolysis of the coolant water in nuclear power reactors with emphasis on ITER. The review is presented in two parts: In Part I, we assess previous work in terms of compliance with important chemical principles and conclude that no model proposed to date is completely satisfactory, in this regard. Thus, some reactions that have been proposed in various radiolysis models are not elementary in nature and can be decomposed into two or more elementary reactions, some of which are already included in the models. These reactions must be removed in formulating a viable model. Furthermore, elementary reactions between species of like charge are also commonly included, but they can be discounted upon the basis of Coulombic repulsion under the prevailing conditions (T < 350 °C) and must also be removed. Likewise, it is concluded that the current state of knowledge with respect to radiolytic yields (i.e., G-values) is also unsatisfactory. More work is required to ensure that the yields used in radiolysis models are truly “primary” yields corresponding to a time scale of nanoseconds or less. This is necessary to ensure that the impact of the reactions that occur outside of the spurs (ionizing particle tracks in the medium) are not counted twice. In Part II, the authors review the use of the radiolysis models coupled with electrochemical models to predict the water chemistry, corrosion potential, crack growth rate in Type 304 SS, and accumulated damage in the coolant circuits of boiling water reactors, pressurized water reactors, and the test fusion reactor, ITER. Based on experience with fission reactors, the emphasis should be placed on the control of the electrochemical corrosion potential because it is the parameter that best describes the state of corrosion in coolant circuits.

show abstract