1999
DOI: 10.1007/s11627-999-0004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of somatic embryos and shoots from sugarbeet callus: Effects of abscisic acid, other growth regulators, nitrogen source, sucrose concentration and genotype

Abstract: Two sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes, REL-1 and REL-2, were used to measure the level of somatic embryo and shoot production fiom hormone-autonomous callus plated under varied nutrient medium combinations of abscisic acid with the growth regulators 6-benzyladenine, 1-naphthaleneacetic acid, or 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, with eight sole nitrogen sources, or with different sucrose concentrations. Clone REL-2 produced embryos up to 35-fold more frequently than clone REL-1. Inclusion of abscisic acid at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, sucrose has been used as the major carbon source in tissue culture (Fuentes et al 2000;Yang et al 2006), which has been found to affect somatic embryogenesis in many plant species (Karami et al 2006;Lou and Kako 1995;Saunders and Tsai 1999). In this study, the effect of sucrose pretreatment on increased embryogenic potential may be linked to both an increase in carbon supply and a change in osmotic potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, sucrose has been used as the major carbon source in tissue culture (Fuentes et al 2000;Yang et al 2006), which has been found to affect somatic embryogenesis in many plant species (Karami et al 2006;Lou and Kako 1995;Saunders and Tsai 1999). In this study, the effect of sucrose pretreatment on increased embryogenic potential may be linked to both an increase in carbon supply and a change in osmotic potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…2). Genotypic variation, primarily because of its highly heterozygous nature due to outcrossing, is a serious problem for in vitro regeneration of sugar beet as certain genotypes are more amenable than others to organogenesis (Detrez et al 1988;Zhong et al 1993b;Gurel et al 2001;Mishutkina and Gaponenko 2006) and somatic embryogenesis (Saunders and Tsai 1999;Zhang et al 2008). To use large numbers of explant replicates from many individual plants within a single line/population was suggested as a mean to cope with variability in sugar beet (Doley and Saunders 1989;IvicHaymes and Smigocki 2005) but the laboriousness of plant tissue culture, coupled with the need to standardize production of parental plants, often restricts feasibility of this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of these compounds 146 BENSON (frequently in combination with ABA) can greatly improve recalcitrance problems associated with embryo and organogenic development in vitro and whole plant regeneration. Thus, ABA and optimal sucrose levels increased the production of somatic embryos and shoots in sugar beet callus (Saunders and Tsai, 1999) and polyethylene glycol combined with ABA induced the later stages of embryo development in Pinus taeda genotypes which were previously unresponsive (Li et al, 1997).…”
Section: In Vitro Manipulationsmentioning
confidence: 90%