2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2006.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production, testing and perspectives of IPV and IPV combination vaccines: GSK biologicals' view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HeLa (human cervical carcinoma) cell line is a standard laboratory model for growing poliovirus. Vero (African green monkey kidney) cell line is also widely used in poliovirus research and is an approved cell line for high-yield commercial poliovirus propagation for vaccine production (29). First, we characterized poliovirus growth in both cell lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HeLa (human cervical carcinoma) cell line is a standard laboratory model for growing poliovirus. Vero (African green monkey kidney) cell line is also widely used in poliovirus research and is an approved cell line for high-yield commercial poliovirus propagation for vaccine production (29). First, we characterized poliovirus growth in both cell lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods increase the possibility of error in the experimental data. Other viral vaccines also have similar problems (19,20). Therefore, an in vitro approach based on the measurement of the antigen content of the vaccine as a surrogate marker of the PRN titer has been successfully applied for some viral vaccines in recent years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, new polio vaccine manufacturing facilities must be capable of compliant operation at the BSL-3 level for the foreseeable future insofar as no date for a cessation of IPV use, which is envisioned minimally to provide coverage through the immediate post eradication period of 3-5 years, is fixed [31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Furthermore, with manufacturing costs for inactivated polio vaccine 20-fold higher than for OPV (OPV), [40][41][42][43] it will be important to further optimize the manufacturing process for the inactivated vaccine, especially for use in developing countries. Furthermore, with manufacturing costs for inactivated polio vaccine 20-fold higher than for OPV (OPV), [40][41][42][43] it will be important to further optimize the manufacturing process for the inactivated vaccine, especially for use in developing countries.…”
Section: Basis For a Standard Vaccine Facility Design Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, as IPV will replace oral polio vaccine (OPV) over the next years and in the future be the only acceptable vaccine for prevention of polio [38] demand for IPV will reach skyward to the order of 450 million doses five times higher than the current global manufacturing capacity for the inactivated viral vaccine, today's existing manufacturing capacity for the inactivated polio vaccine is insufficient to meet the needs for this vaccine [39]. Furthermore, with manufacturing costs for inactivated polio vaccine 20-fold higher than for OPV (OPV), [40][41][42][43] it will be important to further optimize the manufacturing process for the inactivated vaccine, especially for use in developing countries. The optimized manufacturing process and cell substrate recently published by Crucell [44,45] could help to reduce the manufacturing costs of the inactivated vaccine while the flexible, modular facility we describe here will ensure that sufficient manufacturing capacity for this vaccine could be built at an economically viable cost and made available in a short time period.…”
Section: Basis For a Standard Vaccine Facility Design Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%