2013
DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2013.11906554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity and Efficiency Analysis of Smallholder Maize Producers in Southern Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
43
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
15
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that farmers who have allocated fertile land for wheat production were more technically and economically efficient than their counterparts. This result is consistent with the empirical findings of (Fekadu and Bezabih, 2008;Awol, 2014;Mekonnen et al, 2015;Assefa, 2016). Frequency of extension contact had significant and positive effect on technical efficiency at 5%, allocative and economic efficiencies at 1% significance level, respectively.…”
Section: Determinants Of Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that farmers who have allocated fertile land for wheat production were more technically and economically efficient than their counterparts. This result is consistent with the empirical findings of (Fekadu and Bezabih, 2008;Awol, 2014;Mekonnen et al, 2015;Assefa, 2016). Frequency of extension contact had significant and positive effect on technical efficiency at 5%, allocative and economic efficiencies at 1% significance level, respectively.…”
Section: Determinants Of Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Hence, improvement in the level of efficiency will increase productivity by enabling farmers to produce the maximum possible output from a given level of inputs with the existing level of technology Many researchers, in different sectors, have done many efficiency estimation studies in Ethiopia. However, the majority of farm efficiency studies are limited to technical efficiency (Fekadu and Bezabih, 2008;Yami et al, 2013;Beshir, 2016;Kelemu and Negatu, 2016;Assefa, 2016;Tiruneh and Geta, 2016). But, focusing only on technical efficiency (TE) understates the benefits that could be derived by producers from improvements in overall performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Education enables farmers to better access to, understand and interpret agricultural information to adopt technologies and use them more efficiently. Tiruneh and Geta (2016), Geta et al (2013), Yami et al (2013), and Asogwa et al (2012) reported similar results. The result shows that distance to all weather roads affected technical efficiency of barley farmers positively and significantly at 1% significance level against the priori expectation, indicating that farmers living far from allweather roads operate efficiently than the roadside residents.…”
Section: Estimation Of Productivity Parameters and Determinant Factorssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Following Aigner et al (1977), the translog production function has been used recently by many studies to estimate technical inefficiency (Tiruneh and Geta, 2016;Geta et al, 2013;Yami et al, 2013;Beshir et al, 2012). Moreover, the uses of different functional forms have a distinct but small impact on estimated efficiency (Kopp and Smith, 1980).…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thipbharos (2013);Wassie (2012); (Geta et al, 2013) stated that Tobit regression is a model which was developed by Tobin in 1958 that used for deciding the efficiency factors by using two techniques of estimation and translog production function. Ray (1991) and Worthington & Dollery (1999) measured technical efficiency factors by using DEA to predict the value of technical efficiency, and Tobit regression with econometrica equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%