2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity and quality of 'Fuji Suprema' apple fruit in different rootstocks and growing conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of differences in flesh firmness and soluble solids in two of the evaluated seasons supports the findings of SANDER et al (2019), who found no difference in either firmness or soluble solids by evaluating different apple tree training systems, as well as MACEDO et al (2019 and DALLABETTA et al (2017) evaluating the effect of light intensity on the Slender Spindle and Bi-Axis training systems, did not verify differences in flesh firmness. However, sweeter fruits were observed when they were picked in the most apical part in comparison to the basal part of the tree, but with no differences when positioned at the internal and external part at the same level horizontally in the canopy.…”
Section: Rufato Et Alsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of differences in flesh firmness and soluble solids in two of the evaluated seasons supports the findings of SANDER et al (2019), who found no difference in either firmness or soluble solids by evaluating different apple tree training systems, as well as MACEDO et al (2019 and DALLABETTA et al (2017) evaluating the effect of light intensity on the Slender Spindle and Bi-Axis training systems, did not verify differences in flesh firmness. However, sweeter fruits were observed when they were picked in the most apical part in comparison to the basal part of the tree, but with no differences when positioned at the internal and external part at the same level horizontally in the canopy.…”
Section: Rufato Et Alsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The most used rootstocks in apple-growing regions are combinations of 'Marubakaido' (Maruba) and 'M.9' as interstem (Maruba/M.9) and Maruba in regions of high altitude, Ciência Rural, v.52, n.10, 2022. Rufato et al characterized by shallow and stony soils (MACEDO et al, 2019) and 'M.9' in flat areas with deep soils. These rootstocks have several disadvantages, such as low yield efficiency, presence of burr knots, high formation of rootstock suckers and high labor costs when using Maruba, whereas 'M.9' has poor root development, low adaptability to shallow soils and it is sensitive to "replanting diseases", to woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum) and to crown gall disease (Agrobacterium tumefaciens) (REIG et al, 2019;DENARDI et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• TCSA increase (cm 2 ): the average increase in TCSA was obtained by calculating the average of the differences between subsequent years. • Canopy volume (m 3 ): obtained by measuring L = length, H = height from first branch insertion point to apex, W = width, and using equation (L × H × W) (Macedo et al, 2019). • Number of branches: it was obtained by counting all the branches larger than 10 cm spreading out from the central leader.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canopy volume (m 3 ): obtained by measuring L = length, H = height from first branch insertion point to apex, W = width, and using equation (L × H × W) (Macedo et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation