2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity growth, on-the-job search, and unemployment

Abstract: This paper studies the impact of long-run productivity growth on job finding and separation rates, and thus the unemployment rate, using a search and matching model. We incorporate disembodied technological progress and on-the-job search into the endogenous job separation model of Mortensen and Pissarides (1994). The incorporation of on-the-job search allows faster growth to reduce unemployment by decreasing the separation rate and inducing job creation. We demonstrate that introducing on-the-job search substa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is more plausible is the idea that in recessions, there may be fewer opportunities for productivity growth through reallocation across sectors of the economy. We think recent search and matching models that include on-the-job search, such as Michau (2013) and Miyamoto and Takahashi (2011), could be helpful frameworks for further understanding the declines we document.…”
Section: Vb Job Matching and Employment Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…What is more plausible is the idea that in recessions, there may be fewer opportunities for productivity growth through reallocation across sectors of the economy. We think recent search and matching models that include on-the-job search, such as Michau (2013) and Miyamoto and Takahashi (2011), could be helpful frameworks for further understanding the declines we document.…”
Section: Vb Job Matching and Employment Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, in accordance with Mortensen and Pissarides (), Pissarides and Vallanti () and Miyamoto and Takahashi (), we assume the following form for search cost: ξt=ξ¯yt; that is, the search cost is proportionate to the scale of production, ξ¯(0,1) . Then, substituting ξt=ξ¯yt, (18) and (19) into (16) yieldsfalse(1αfalse)false(1normalΩ(z¯,β)false)=(1+rt)ξ¯false(1+gt1false)qfalse(θt1false))(rtrt1α1α,where gt1false(NtNt1false)/Nt1 is the growth rate of the variety.…”
Section: Labour Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning now to the innovation location decision, we show that all intermediate firms locate process innovation in the country with the larger market. With constant national employment levels, intermediate production shares (27) and knowledge spillovers ( 13) are constant in the steady state (k = 0). Accordingly, the no-arbitrage condition for investment in process innovation (16) indicates that with symmetric initial productivity levels (z = z * ), the location with a higher level of knowledge spillovers (k) attracts all innovation activity, and all firms experience the same rate of productivity growth (ż/z =ż * /z * ).…”
Section: Production and Innovation Location Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing first the knowledge spillover effect, from ( 13), an increase in the degree of knowledge diffusion (λ) directly raises the level of knowledge spillovers (k). Similarly, from (27), an increase in the freeness of trade (ϕ) strengthens the home market effect, causing the home share of intermediate production (s) and the level of knowledge spillovers (k) to both rise. In either case, the technology condition (35) shifts to the right in Figure 1, with greater knowledge spillovers allowing for a faster rate of productivity growth (36).…”
Section: Economic Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%