2006
DOI: 10.1002/ts.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Productivity of forage legumes intercropped with maize and their acceptability to livestock in the savanna zone of Nigeria

Abstract: Farmers in a village in northern Nigeria grew six forage legumes as intercrops with maize in two seasons. Lablab purpurens gave the best yield and economic performance while Centrosema pubescens was more appreciated by the livestock as feed. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this decline, however, lablab appears to persist as a garden crop (rather than a field crop) in eastern and southern Africa; and recent market surveys from eastern Africa suggest that there is a high demand (and subsequently a good price) for lablab in Kenya (Ngailo et al 2003). There is almost no ongoing lablab research in Africa, except for programs focusing on improving soil properties by using green-manure/forage crops, such as in maize-based systems of Kenya (Mureithi et al 2003; Cheruiyot et al 2007; Lelei et al 2009), Malawi (Sakala et al 2004) and Nigeria (e.g., Ibewiro et al 2000; Amodu et al 2004; Gbaraneh et al 2004; Rahman and Ogungbile 2006), or sorghum- and millet-based systems in the semi-arid tropics of Mali (Kouyaté et al 2000). Almost all of these African initiatives have included and continue to include one popular late-maturing forage cultivar, cv.…”
Section: Four Thesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this decline, however, lablab appears to persist as a garden crop (rather than a field crop) in eastern and southern Africa; and recent market surveys from eastern Africa suggest that there is a high demand (and subsequently a good price) for lablab in Kenya (Ngailo et al 2003). There is almost no ongoing lablab research in Africa, except for programs focusing on improving soil properties by using green-manure/forage crops, such as in maize-based systems of Kenya (Mureithi et al 2003; Cheruiyot et al 2007; Lelei et al 2009), Malawi (Sakala et al 2004) and Nigeria (e.g., Ibewiro et al 2000; Amodu et al 2004; Gbaraneh et al 2004; Rahman and Ogungbile 2006), or sorghum- and millet-based systems in the semi-arid tropics of Mali (Kouyaté et al 2000). Almost all of these African initiatives have included and continue to include one popular late-maturing forage cultivar, cv.…”
Section: Four Thesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection process was based on a four point score evaluation for the means of each of the parameters assessed in the three soya bean processing experiments. This four point score evaluation is irrespective of means similarities (P<0.05) within the same parameter and the cumulative average points score for each of the experimental treatment groups were ranked according to the methods described by Ajayi (2005) and Rahman and Ogungbile (2006). The scores were as follows: 1 = Fair; 2 = Good; 3 = Better and 4 = Best mean.…”
Section: Selection Process For Best Meansmentioning
confidence: 99%