Produtividade E Composição Botânica De Tifton 85 Nas Diferentes Estações Do Ano Sob Irrigação

Sanches, Arthur Carniato; Gomes, Éder Pereira; Rickli, Max Emerson; Soares, Mayra Renata Cruz; Medonça, F.C.; Amaral, Mário Aparecido

doi:10.12702/iii.inovagri.2015-a064

Cited by 2 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These are corroborated with literature, which mentioned accumulations between 55 and 90 kg DM ha -1 day -1 for irrigated Tifton 85 grass (Ribeiro and Pereira, 2011;Gomes et al, 2015a, Sanches et al, 2016. Meanwhile, in the irrigated area the accumulated dry matter has been between 105 and 125 kg DM ha -1 day -1 (Queiroz et al, 2012, Nogueira et al, 2013, Teixeira et al, 2013, Gomes et al, 2015b, Sanches et al, 2016. Sanches et al, 2016 reported yield of 37603.1 and 25457.6 kg ha -1 year -1 in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in a study on Tifton 85, which is consistent with the results of present study.…”

Section: Yield Parameters Of Forage Dry Mattersupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Meanwhile, in the irrigated area the accumulated dry matter has been between 105 and 125 kg DM ha -1 day -1 (Queiroz et al, 2012, Nogueira et al, 2013, Teixeira et al, 2013, Gomes et al, 2015b, Sanches et al, 2016. Sanches et al, 2016 reported yield of 37603.1 and 25457.6 kg ha -1 year -1 in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in a study on Tifton 85, which is consistent with the results of present study. Thus, it is observed that the irrigation contributes to increasing yield in cycles possibly through favouring the assimilation of available soil and climate resources.…”

Section: Yield Parameters Of Forage Dry Mattersupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Therefore, the use of irrigation could reduce the seasonality, as already observed by other authors (Nogueira et al, 2013;Teixeira et al, 2013;Gomes et al, 2015a;Sanches et al, 2015;Sanches et al, 2016).…”

Section: Yield Parameters Of Forage Dry Mattersupporting

confidence: 60%

“…In the dry season, lower temperatures must have influenced negatively, reducing the quality of the forage, producing higher levels of NDF and ADF. However, Sanches et al (2016) working with Tifton 85 at different seasons (autumn, winter, spring and summer) did not observe significant results for NDF and ADF. However, irrigation had a negative effect of 4% of NDF.…”

Section: Bromatological Parameters: Nutritive Value Of Foragementioning

confidence: 78%

“…However, this supplemental irrigation could no eliminate the seasonality (Sanches et al, 2015). In this sense, we highlight the Cynodons, which has presented excellent productive results with irrigation, attenuating the seasonality with good nutritional results, especially the Tifton 85 grass (Gomes et al, 2015b;Sanches et al, 2015Sanches et al, , 2016Sanches et al, , 2017.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 86%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Application of swine wastewater for irrigation of Tifton 85 grass: Part I-productivity and nutritional quality

Gomes¹,

Sanches²,

Dias³

et al. 2018

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of swine wastewater (SW) for irrigation can be an excellent alternative to increase productivity and quality of pastures. This work was carried out from October 2013 to September 2014 in Dourados -MS. The objectives were evaluation of the productivity and nutritional quality of Tifton 85 grass (Cynodon spp.) under different doses of SW in the presence and absence of normal water irrigation. The experiment was set in a randomized block with split plots design, including water irrigated and non-irrigated in the main plots and four doses of SW in the subplots (75, 150, 225 and 300 m 3 ha -1 cut -1 ), with four replicates. The total forage yield and the bromatological value (crude protein, neutral and fibre detergent acid and dry matter digestibility) were evaluated. There was a significant effect of irrigation and SW doses on total dry matter yield, reaching 41.4 Mg ha -1 year -1 using the highest dose of SW (300 m 3 ha -1) and irrigation use. Irrigation also provided higher crude protein levels, increasing with linear adjustment to SW doses, reaching 17.9% in the annual average. The neutral detergent fibre and the acid detergent fibre presented lower results under irrigation, reaching 65.4 and 32.6% in the annual average, respectively, and linearly decreased using SW doses. Inverse behavior was observed in the in vitro digestibility of dry matter, which was higher under irrigation, reaching 69.5% in the annual average and presenting linear growth according to doses of SW.

show abstract

Section: Yield Parameters Of Forage Dry Mattersupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Yield Parameters Of Forage Dry Mattersupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Yield Parameters Of Forage Dry Mattersupporting

confidence: 60%

Section: Bromatological Parameters: Nutritive Value Of Foragementioning

confidence: 78%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 86%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Application of swine wastewater for irrigation of Tifton 85 grass: Part I-productivity and nutritional quality

Gomes¹,

Sanches²,

Dias³

et al. 2018

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Productivity and nutritional quality of Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã grass fertirrigated with swine wastewater in different seasons of the year

Gomes¹,

Sanches²,

Deboleto³

et al. 2017

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Brazilian swine production has been grown 38.9% in the last decade. Inherent to the process, the pollution potential has increased which brings environmental concerns, especially about the final disposal of swine wastewater (SW). In this context, this work aimed to evaluate the responses of 'Piatã' grass (Urochloa brizantha, cv. BRS 'Piatã') to the fertilization with SW, with and without supplemental irrigation. The experiment was carried out for one year from March 2014 to March 2015. The experiment was conducted in a split-plot with a random blocks experimental design with four replications. The treatments in the plots were referred to the use of irrigation (with and without), and in the subplots to the SW doses (four doses: 75, 150, 225 and 300 m 3 ha -1 ). In the irrigated treatment, the irrigation was fulfilled to re-establish soil moisture in the field capacity (Ө fc ). The parameters used to verify the treatments were: total forage yield (TFY), leaves and stems yield (LSY), crude protein rate (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and in vitro dry matter digestibility (DivDM). There was a significant increasing effect for doses, reaching a mean TFY of 41.92 Mg ha -1 at the dose of 300 m 3 ha -1 . The combination of the highest dose of SW combined with supplemental irrigation produced the best results of TFY and LSY with (47.8 and 41.9 Mg ha -1 year -1 , respectively). Irrigation also led to the best results per cycle, with the highest forage accumulation in spring, 12.28 and 8.55 Mg ha -1 for irrigated and non-irrigated treatments, respectively. In the bromatological parameters, supplemental irrigation led to the highest average levels of CP, ADF and DivDM of 16.7%, 33.8% and 66.5%, respectively. The NDF did not respond to irrigation and SW doses. The research allowed concluding that irrigation and SW fertigation brought quantitative and qualitative benefits to 'Piatã' grass production.

show abstract

Produtividade E Composição Botânica De Tifton 85 Nas Diferentes Estações Do Ano Sob Irrigação

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Application of swine wastewater for irrigation of Tifton 85 grass: Part I-productivity and nutritional quality

Application of swine wastewater for irrigation of Tifton 85 grass: Part I-productivity and nutritional quality

Productivity and nutritional quality of Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã grass fertirrigated with swine wastewater in different seasons of the year

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About