Profession and professionalisation in medical radiation science as an emergent profession

Sim, Jenny; Radloff, Alex

doi:10.1016/j.radi.2008.05.001

Cited by 53 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The comparison between the professional capabilities expected of radiographers as outlined by the MRPBA and previous studies performed in Australian clinical centres demonstrate obvious inconsistencies . To gain registration or remain as a registered radiographer, a practitioner must be able to demonstrate the scope of capabilities as identified in the “Professional Capabilities for Medical Radiation Practice” by the MRPBA .…”

Section: Professional Entitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Australian researchers have expressed differing opinions over concerns of radiographers’ scope of practice and factors that hinder their willingness and ability to carry out justification of radiographic examinations . Yielder and Davis explored key issues characterising the radiography profession's cultures in the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia.…”

Section: International Regulatory Bodiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Maintaining the hierarchical position by the medical profession can become a significant barrier to professional role advancement. A conforming work culture could result in tendencies where radiographers are unwilling to challenge traditional models and protocols and would be reluctant to challenge requests that are potentially inappropriate . Lewis et al suggested that there are a number of contributing factors such as medical dominance and the presence of the private radiology enterprise that affects radiographer's ethical commitments to patients.…”

Section: International Regulatory Bodiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering the practice of justification is based on the application of evidence‐based research, justification should encourage critical thinking. This allows for the development of new practices and protocols, benefiting patients in the future …”

Section: Benefits Of Justificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Justification of radiographic examinations: What are the key issues?

Vom

Williams

2017

J Med Radiat Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Justification of radiographic examinations is the practice of evaluating requested radiological examinations to assess for clinical merit and appropriateness based on clinical notes and patient information. This implies that justification in radiography requires the evaluation of requested examinations, the justification of exposures being applied and determining whether patients fit the recommended criteria for the procedure. Medico‐legal requirements by the professional registration body, the Medical Radiation Practice Board of Australia (MRPBA), identify justification as an advocated and obligatory practice for radiographers. Yet, justification remains an inconsistent practice implemented amongst Australian radiographers. This review aims to identify associated barriers inhibiting the consistent practice of justification and the hesitance by radiographers in practicing justification responsibilities. It also recommends a change in workplace culture which encourages radiographers to accept a more autonomous role that cultivates critical thinking, reflection and research‐informed decision making as justification will ultimately benefit patients.

show abstract

Section: Professional Entitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: International Regulatory Bodiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: International Regulatory Bodiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Benefits Of Justificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Justification of radiographic examinations: What are the key issues?

Vom

Williams

2017

J Med Radiat Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In an era of advancing technology and evolving practice health practitioners need to update practices continually in order to provide quality healthcare 1,2. Radiation therapists (RTs) are required to maintain skills and knowledge in current practice while adapting to this ongoing change.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation

Becker

Bridge

Brown

et al. 2015

J of Medical Radiation Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionConstantly evolving technology and techniques within radiation therapy require practitioners to maintain a continuous approach to professional development and training. Systems of performance appraisal and adoption of regular feedback mechanisms are vital to support this development yet frequently lack structure and rely on informal peer support.MethodsA Radiation Therapy Performance Appraisal Framework (RT-PAF) for radiation therapists in planning and simulation was developed to define expectations of practice and promote a supportive and objective culture of performance and skills appraisal. Evaluation of the framework was conducted via an anonymous online survey tool. Nine peer reviewers and fourteen recipients provided feedback on its effectiveness and the challenges and limitations of the approach.ResultsFindings from the evaluation were positive and suggested that both groups gained benefit from and expressed a strong interest in embedding the approach more routinely. Respondents identified common challenges related to the limited ability to implement suggested development strategies; this was strongly associated with time and rostering issues.ConclusionsThis framework successfully defined expectations for practice and provided a fair and objective feedback process that focussed on skills development. It empowered staff to maintain their skills and reach their professional potential. Management support, particularly in regard to provision of protected time was highlighted as critical to the framework's ongoing success. The demonstrated benefits arising in terms of staff satisfaction and development highlight the importance of this commitment to the modern radiation therapy workforce.

show abstract

Exploring radiographers' attitudes to mandatory CPD in the United Kingdom and New Zealand

2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: This paper reports the first phase of a two‐phase longitudinal study which explored the attitudes of radiographers in two countries (UK and New Zealand) towards CPD, before and after the introduction of a mandatory CPD policy. In addition, this paper outlines in brief the planned phase two of the project, which will be undertaken to assess whether attitudes change over time, following the introduced mandate. Methods: 1739 radiographers across both countries were approached via a survey using a written questionnaire with quantitative and qualitative components endorsed by the relevant professional body in each country (Society of Radiographers and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technologists). The questionnaire was statistically analysed using t‐tests. In addition, the qualitative components were analysed thematically, to add depth and explanations to the findings. This paper presents the results, focusing especially on the qualitative data in order to fully explore the attitudes demonstrated. Results: The results of the study showed that a degree of apathy surrounded CPD participation, despite the professional expectation that staff be CPD active. On an individual level, radiographers self reported a low level, or a complete lack of formal recording of CPD. A number of barriers were identified, which were perceived by participants to restrict their CPD activity, including, of particular note, poor staffing levels and lack of employer support. Radiographers in both countries appeared to have a narrow understanding of what is perceived to constitute CPD, with an apparent focus on formal, attendance‐based activities. Less formal, on‐the‐job activities were not always considered as CPD by participants in this study. Conclusion: This study outlined a range of factors which impact on attitudes towards CPD, with many similarities in findings across both countries represented. A lack of intrinsic motivation was demonstrated, which is perceived to hamper active participation in CPD. There was a desire for personal benefit from CPD participation to be evident, in order to motivate individuals to get actively involved. The complexity of the current working environment was outlined, with acknowledgement that the mandatory policy towards CPD is not the only factor affecting participation. While further research will be required to examine the impact of all the variables affecting CPD, the results of this study may allow individuals and managers to begin to interact with CPD participation in order to attempt to increase the level and effectiveness of learning in practice.

show abstract

Profession and professionalisation in medical radiation science as an emergent profession

Cited by 53 publications

References 12 publications

Justification of radiographic examinations: What are the key issues?

Justification of radiographic examinations: What are the key issues?

Evaluation of a performance appraisal framework for radiation therapists in planning and simulation

Exploring radiographers' attitudes to mandatory CPD in the United Kingdom and New Zealand

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About