Professional accounts of electroconvulsive therapy: A discourse analysis

Abstract

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a socially contested psychiatric intervention. However, the accounts of professionals involved in its use have rarely been systematically investigated.This study aimed to examine the accounts of clinicians who have used ECT on a routine basis. Eight health professionals (psychiatrists, anaesthetists and psychiatric nurses) with experience of ECT administration were interviewed about the procedure. Discourse Analysis was used to interpret the interview transcripts. Interviewees appeared to draw on a repertoire which constructed ECT recipients as severely ill. This was used to support claims which had the effect of: defining who should receive ECT; warranting the use of urgent physical psychiatric treatments; reformulating distress in biological terms; and discounting the therapeutic value of alternative, non-physical interventions. The interviewees managed concerns about ECT in a variety of ways, for example by: rendering it as a medical procedure with concomitant risks and benefits; downplaying a lack of clarity over its evidence base; and undermining the legitimacy of criticisms. Implications of these findings are discussed. Abstract word count: 166 words

Learning to Use Discourse Analysis on a Professional Psychology Training Programme: Accounts of Supervisees and a Supervisor

“…Cooper and (1999) and he felt that this had encouraged him to want to publish (something he eventually did: Stevens and Harper, 2007). However, Julia, Peter and Phil were also tired at the end of a demanding training and felt that they needed a break.…”

Doing Fence Sitting

“…Researchers have therefore suggested that clinical psychologists' conceptualizations of mental health have significant clinical implications for their work with service users (Hugo, 2001;Stevens & Harper, 2007).…”

Counselling psychology and schizophrenia: A critical discursive account

“…The synthesis which emanates, known as 'critical discursive psychology', Wetherell (1998) and Edley (2001) argue, will allow for a more integrated approach to discourse analysis that can respond to criticisms of both discursive psychology and FDA. As a result, critical discursive psychology (Edley & Wetherell, 1999, 2001Stevens & Harper, 2007;Wetherell, 1998) was chosen as the most appropriate method in addressing the research as within this approach the analysis consists of an examination of the local organisation of talk, as well as the organisation of the broad, social and culturally resonant interpretative resources the participants draw upon (Edley & Wetherell, 2001).…”