2020
DOI: 10.5093/jwop2020a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional Aspirations as Indicators of Responsible Leadership Style and Corporate Social Responsibility. Are We Training the Responsible Managers that Business and Society Need? A Cross-national Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Voegtlin et al (2020) verified the facilitating effects of leader empathy, positive affect, and universal value orientation on responsible leadership behavior through empirical research [22]. Sánchez et al (2020) found that personal aspirations and anticipated workplace behavior patterns are associated with responsible leadership styles, through a study among future leaders [10]. However, Machiavellianism may encourage leaders to demonstrate irresponsible behavior [11].…”
Section: Antecedents Of Responsible Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Voegtlin et al (2020) verified the facilitating effects of leader empathy, positive affect, and universal value orientation on responsible leadership behavior through empirical research [22]. Sánchez et al (2020) found that personal aspirations and anticipated workplace behavior patterns are associated with responsible leadership styles, through a study among future leaders [10]. However, Machiavellianism may encourage leaders to demonstrate irresponsible behavior [11].…”
Section: Antecedents Of Responsible Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…There are still many challenges for establishing responsible leadership, both in theory and in practice [8], which require further in-depth exploration [9]. Despite the growing corpus of literature on responsible leadership, responsible leadership styles, as well as individual characteristics, situational factors, and corporate social responsibility policy and practice associated with responsible leadership are still poorly understood [10]. Previous studies have mostly explored the possible outcomes of responsible leadership, especially in terms of employee and organizational performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the studies of Sánchez et al (2020) and Dugan et al (2011) provide evidence that the context can push Latin American leaders to engage in RL from an early age. In their study, the authors investigated the relationship between RL styles and ratings regarding corporate social responsibilities in 1,833 business management students (mean age of 22) from six Ibero-American universities.…”
Section: Characteristics Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, when examining the possible effects that the educational context can have on the style that future leaders adopt, the works by Sánchez et al (2020) and Dugan et al (2011) highlight that the idiosyncrasies of Latin American countries seem to awaken in future leaders an orientation towards the inherent social and economic needs and shortcomings of such contexts. Therefore, future leaders educated in these contexts often show an orientation towards a leadership style that considers the needs of their organization and stakeholders: a leadership style characterized by responsibility.…”
Section: Characteristics Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maak et al (2016) have proposed a theoretical framework based on the analysis of some behavioral-based classification of responsible leadership to explore the micro-foundations of political CSR. These authors have proposed integrative and instrumental as two styles of RL that differ in the values and implications for CSR-related behavioral patterns (Sánchez et al , 2020). The leaders’ adoption of these responsible leadership styles is dependent upon their different value orientations reflecting the degree of perceived fiduciary duty or welfare orientation (Maak et al , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%