2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-021-00537-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional chess expertise modulates whole brain functional connectivity pattern homogeneity and couplings

Abstract: Previous studies have revealed changed functional connectivity patterns between brain areas in chess players using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). However, how to exactly characterize the voxel-wise whole brain functional connectivity pattern changes in chess players remains unclear, which could provide more convincing evidence for establishing the relationship between longterm chess practice and brain function changes. In this study, we employed newly developed whole brain funct… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was discovered that distinctive neural activation patterns were identified in chess experts as compared to those of novices during chess‐related tasks (Campitelli et al., 2007). In particular, functional magnetic resonance imaging studies demonstrated the interplay between the frontal and parietal regions in experts, involving a chunking process during the chess task (Bilalić et al., 2010; Gobet & Charness, 2018; Schubotz et al., 2012; Song et al., 2020; Song et al., 2022). More importantly, previous studies also illustrated that distinct brain regions were involved in the segmentation and concatenation processes within the chunking process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was discovered that distinctive neural activation patterns were identified in chess experts as compared to those of novices during chess‐related tasks (Campitelli et al., 2007). In particular, functional magnetic resonance imaging studies demonstrated the interplay between the frontal and parietal regions in experts, involving a chunking process during the chess task (Bilalić et al., 2010; Gobet & Charness, 2018; Schubotz et al., 2012; Song et al., 2020; Song et al., 2022). More importantly, previous studies also illustrated that distinct brain regions were involved in the segmentation and concatenation processes within the chunking process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have done research on chess players with different performance levels, with focus on amateur/novice ( Blanch and Llaveria, 2021 ), on professional players/experts (adolescent elite chess players— De Bruin et al, 2007 ; adult international chess grandmaster— Fuentes-García et al, 2022 ) or comparative studies on these categories, that provide more convincing evidences that chess master players are different from novice players in brain functional organization of local connections and global topologies ( Song et al, 2022 ). This type of research focuses on the analysis of the conditions that lead to chess performance, including certain psycho-social and physical characteristics of the player, which we will detail later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Harel et al (2010) demonstrated enhanced neuronal activity in the right precuneus of a group of car experts related to better memory retrieval strategies. Song et al (2021) reported increased activation in the right anterior cingulate gyrus, but decreased activation in the superior parietal lobule in chess players ( Song et al, 2020 ), which is closely related to improved visual processing and better attention control. These results derived from cross-sectional studies demonstrated that real-world visual experience alters the strength of evoked brain activity across widely distributed regions, which are supportive of high-order cognitive, such as attention control, working memory, and memory, and low-order visual components, such as visual processing ( Khader et al, 2005 ; Cavanna and Trimble, 2006 ; Schipul and Just, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%