2018
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional collaboration in searching the evidence for an ill‐defined concept

Abstract: This paper outlines the inter-professional collaboration of the authors, a PhD student, his supervisor and an information professional, to systematically search the literature for an ill-defined concept. The research question posed for the scoping literature review indicated that the topic, the subjective socio-economic status and health of adults with intellectual disabilities, was rare. The need for a methodological search process was therefore identified and successfully carried out. The paper presents an a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of multi-professional search collaboration have been identified by McMahon et al (2018) who outline the joint efforts of a PHD student, their supervisor, and an information professional to systematically search the literature for an ill-defined concept. The authors describe the transformative learning process for the researcher in a collaborative multi-professional search exercise in which their understanding of information science was deepened (McMahon et al, 2018). Within-team mentoring programs have also been trialled by Jones et al (2020) as part of their quality improvement program.…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of multi-professional search collaboration have been identified by McMahon et al (2018) who outline the joint efforts of a PHD student, their supervisor, and an information professional to systematically search the literature for an ill-defined concept. The authors describe the transformative learning process for the researcher in a collaborative multi-professional search exercise in which their understanding of information science was deepened (McMahon et al, 2018). Within-team mentoring programs have also been trialled by Jones et al (2020) as part of their quality improvement program.…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%