2011
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.29147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional Development Experiences: Are Psychology Interns Getting Enough?

Abstract: Understanding the professional development needs of psychology interns is essential to maximize the utility of predoctoral internship training; yet, little research has explored the professional development training experiences interns receive. In Study 1, 275 psychology interns from APPIC-listed programs completed a 20-question web-based anonymous survey, assessing experiences of and satisfaction with professional development training obtained on internship. Using a mixed method research design, a series of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several limitations of our survey that must be considered when interpreting our results. Although the response rate we obtained is consistent with studies targeting TDs (e.g., Ginkel, Davis, & Michael, 2010;Kluck, Pennuto, & Hartmann, 2011;Rings, Genuchi, Hall, Angelo, & Cornish, 2009), we cannot be certain that the TDs who responded are truly representative of all internship TDs. In addition, the sample size for some of the subgroups was modest, so conclusions drawn on these subgroups should be viewed as tentative.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…There are several limitations of our survey that must be considered when interpreting our results. Although the response rate we obtained is consistent with studies targeting TDs (e.g., Ginkel, Davis, & Michael, 2010;Kluck, Pennuto, & Hartmann, 2011;Rings, Genuchi, Hall, Angelo, & Cornish, 2009), we cannot be certain that the TDs who responded are truly representative of all internship TDs. In addition, the sample size for some of the subgroups was modest, so conclusions drawn on these subgroups should be viewed as tentative.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 47%