2017
DOI: 10.1080/1046560x.2016.1277599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional Development for Middle School Science Teachers: Does an Educative Curriculum Make a Difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Drake et al, 2014). Furthermore, educative curriculum materials are not a panacea and should be supported by strong professional development (e.g., Pringle, Mesa, & Hayes, 2017). Empirical research could investigate how professional development and educative curriculum materials work together to support teacher learning.…”
Section: Implications For Studying Educative Curriculum Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drake et al, 2014). Furthermore, educative curriculum materials are not a panacea and should be supported by strong professional development (e.g., Pringle, Mesa, & Hayes, 2017). Empirical research could investigate how professional development and educative curriculum materials work together to support teacher learning.…”
Section: Implications For Studying Educative Curriculum Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nach der Entwicklung von Glaser und Strauss in den 70er Jahren kam es zum Diskurs zwischen den beiden Gründern, wobei Glaser einen in der Wissenschaftstheorie längst überwundenen, naiven Induktionismus vertritt (Strübing, 2014, 458 ralisierbare Erkenntnisse abgeleitet werden (Petri, 2014 B. Remillard, 1999;Schneider & Krajcik, 2002;Collopy, 2003;Drake & Sherin, 2006;Roehrig, Kruse & Kern, 2007;Vos et al, 2011;Charalambous & Hill, 2012;Bismack et al, 2015;Davis et al, 2017;Pringle, Mesa & Haynes, 2017 Kagan (1990, 459): [T]he use of multimethod approaches appears to be superior, not simply because they allow triangulation of data but because they are more likely to capture the complex, multifaceted aspects of teaching and learning.…”
Section: Es Liegen Allerdings Auch Befunde Aus Deutschland Vor Wonach Lehrkräfteunclassified
“…Überdies wird qualitative Forschung als Sammelbegri für alles, was nicht als quantitative Forschung gilt, verwendet, weshalb teilweise sehr unterschiedliche Verfahren zusammengefasst werden (Strübing et al, 2018). Die gewählten Erhebungsinstrumente konnten sich bereits in vorangehenden Studien zu ähnlichen Forschungsfragen bewähren (Remillard, 1999;Schneider & Krajcik, 2002;Collopy, 2003;Drake & Sherin, 2006;Roehrig, Kruse & Kern, 2007;Vos et al, 2011;Charalambous & Hill, 2012;Bismack et al, 2015;Davis et al, 2017;Pringle, Mesa & Haynes, 2017). Ferner fand eine begründete Abwägung mit alternativen Erhebungsinstrumenten statt (vgl.…”
Section: Für Die Vorliegende Arbeitunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent analysis of the effectiveness of these materials shows that when they are used in conjunction with PLD, they are effective in facilitating teacher learning and instrumental in changing teaching practice (Donna & Hick, 2017;Pringle, Mesa, & Hayes, 2017).…”
Section: Final Thoughts and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%