2016
DOI: 10.4324/9781315602325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional Discretion in Welfare Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, our analysis is influenced by sociological writings on the professions, and recognition that experience at the ''street level'' is important to scrutinize when national top-down imperatives meet everyday practices (Evans, 2010). Significant here are the concepts of discretion and jurisdiction (Abbott, 1988;Evans, 2010;Freidson, 2001).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretically, our analysis is influenced by sociological writings on the professions, and recognition that experience at the ''street level'' is important to scrutinize when national top-down imperatives meet everyday practices (Evans, 2010). Significant here are the concepts of discretion and jurisdiction (Abbott, 1988;Evans, 2010;Freidson, 2001).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, our analysis is influenced by sociological writings on the professions, and recognition that experience at the ''street level'' is important to scrutinize when national top-down imperatives meet everyday practices (Evans, 2010). Significant here are the concepts of discretion and jurisdiction (Abbott, 1988;Evans, 2010;Freidson, 2001). Whereas discretion refers to one's autonomous use of training, knowledge, and skills with few external decrees when making judicious decisions (Freidson, 2001), jurisdiction concerns the link between a profession and its work (Abbott, 1988).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In doing so, research has identified some major concerns in using EISs, uncovering how such systems tend to reduce social work to a technical practice (Aronson & Smith, 2010;Tsui & Cheung, 2004), emphasising predictability and controllability rather than contributing to the development of a responsive practice (Aas, 2004;Bovens & Zouridis, 2002;Burton & van den Broek, 2009;Devlieghere, Bradt & Roose, 2016;Hall et al, 2010;Parton, 2006;Pithouse et al, 2012). This is, however, not necessarily the case as several authors have demonstrated how practitioners, as well as (middle) managers, use their discretion to develop strategies to shape, reshape and even bend regulations and procedures for using EISs in social work practice, aiming precisely to achieve a responsive social work practice (Aronson & Smith, 2009;Evans, 2010Evans, , 2011Evans, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, however, not necessarily the case as several authors have demonstrated how practitioners, as well as (middle) managers, use their discretion to develop strategies to shape, reshape and even bend regulations and procedures for using EISs in social work practice, aiming precisely to achieve a responsive social work practice (Aronson & Smith, 2009; Evans, 2010, 2011, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%