2022
DOI: 10.21061/see.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional Engineering Socialization at the Intersection of Collective Constructions of Expectations and Individual Shame Experiences

Abstract: Background: Prior work has investigated engineering students' professional formation through the lens of individual experience and from a cultural perspective. The concept of professional shame provides an opportunity to explore students' experiences of disciplinary expectations as situated in a context of engineering social norms. 2 Kamanda et al. Studies in Engineering Education 3 Kamanda et al. Studies in Engineering Education LITERATURE REVIEWIn this section, we explore prior work around student stressors … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis in this paper follows a broader investigation in which we conducted in-depth interviews (n = 16) and focus groups (n = 10) with engineering students (n = 38). We analyzed the interviews with engineering students using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach [6][7]19], and we analyzed the focus groups using an ethnographic perspective [5][6][7]. These findings, and our rationale for using a qualitative mixed-methods approach to study the sociopsychological phenomenon of professional shame [20], are published elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our analysis in this paper follows a broader investigation in which we conducted in-depth interviews (n = 16) and focus groups (n = 10) with engineering students (n = 38). We analyzed the interviews with engineering students using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach [6][7]19], and we analyzed the focus groups using an ethnographic perspective [5][6][7]. These findings, and our rationale for using a qualitative mixed-methods approach to study the sociopsychological phenomenon of professional shame [20], are published elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, our ethnographic analysis of student focus groups demonstrated that the emotional experience, and the cultural scripts for expressing or regulating the emotion, were connected to the identityrelevant expectations that pervaded engineering programs. Students collectively defined being an engineer as connected intellectual performance and work ethic, and when they inevitably failed to meet such expectations, they were often unable to express the emotional experience in the context of their engineering programs [5][6][7].…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Professional Shamementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation