2018
DOI: 10.1037/tra0000263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional quality of life normative benchmarks.

Abstract: Values gathered from the literature review tend to align well with one another and suggest that within a given sample, CS scores tend to be higher than BO scores, and BO scores tend to be slightly higher than CF scores. (PsycINFO Database Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
39
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
39
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For ease of interpretation, subscale models were shown alongside low, middle, and high category cut-scores reported for care giving occupations (32). Burnout subscale scores were classified as follows: 10-19 as low, scores 20-26 as average, and 27-50 as high.…”
Section: Professional Quality Of Life Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For ease of interpretation, subscale models were shown alongside low, middle, and high category cut-scores reported for care giving occupations (32). Burnout subscale scores were classified as follows: 10-19 as low, scores 20-26 as average, and 27-50 as high.…”
Section: Professional Quality Of Life Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary Traumatic Stress subscale scores were classified as follows: 10-13 as low, scores 14-20 as average, and 21-50 as high. Compassion Satisfaction subscale scores were classified as follows: 10-33 as low; 34-41 as average; and 42-50 as high (32).…”
Section: Professional Quality Of Life Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study adopted a two-wave, cross-lagged panel design inhibiting the observation of curvilinear trends and confounding the observed changes with measurement errors [ 101 , 102 , 103 ]. Also, it is vital to note that the prevalence rates reported by the studies included in the current review used the 2010 cut-off criteria provided by Stamm [ 91 ], which have now been replaced by up-to-date normative data [ 104 ]. No study included in the present review used the recent cut-off scores to classify participants into low, average and high categories, thereby obfuscating the prevalence rate of compassion fatigue in mental health professionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, no study included in the present review used the latest, up-to-date normative benchmarks [ 104 ] for classifying the participants into different categories. The latest cut-off scores that were based on a review of 30 studies [ 104 ] differ from the original cut-off scores provided by Stamm [ 91 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation