2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/fie56618.2022.9962700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professional Skill Opportunities Survey: Development and Exploratory Factor Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this study encourages engineering education educators to seek to disrupt any lingering traditional view of engineering that keeps professional skills as a separate and often unspoken part of student development. Second, professional skills should be purposefully scaffolded into educational curriculum and explicitly defined, learned, assessed [34,35], and practiced as part of student preparation. Doing so would allow students to learn about and understand their own professional strengths and weaknesses, and seek to further develop any inadequate areas via co-curricular and extra-curricular mechanisms before the end of their formal education journey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this study encourages engineering education educators to seek to disrupt any lingering traditional view of engineering that keeps professional skills as a separate and often unspoken part of student development. Second, professional skills should be purposefully scaffolded into educational curriculum and explicitly defined, learned, assessed [34,35], and practiced as part of student preparation. Doing so would allow students to learn about and understand their own professional strengths and weaknesses, and seek to further develop any inadequate areas via co-curricular and extra-curricular mechanisms before the end of their formal education journey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project on which this WIP is based is an explanatory mixed methods study. The quantitative piece of our work utilizes two survey instruments, the Undergraduate Study Support (USS) survey [7], [8], and the Professional Skills Opportunities (PSO) survey [9], [10]. The USS is based in our prior work on social capital in engineering education [7], [8], [11], [12]; it asks participants to identify salient people in their social network, and asks about the supports or resources those individuals as well as others provide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resource generator portion of the USS asks participants to identify specific resources they have received related to engineering success, such as someone recommending courses or introducing them to other people in their professional network. The PSO focuses on students' opportunities to practice five professional skills (problem-solving; business and management principles; communication; professional and ethical responsibilities; and shared leadership, which is a combination of teamwork and leadership skills) [9], [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a technique, CI has seen widespread use in this way across many fields including psychology, education, business, and political science [2]. In EER, CI has been used in this way to improve the design of measures of many topics, including professional skills development [3], social capital resources [4], and student responses to instructional strategies [5].…”
Section: Review Of Cognitive Interviewingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive interviewing can be used to achieve the goals above, but it can also be used as an independent method of data collection or to support other analytical techniques. For example, qualitative analyses of CI data in EER, such as those in a recent paper by Li et al [3] can avail researchers of important differences between groups (e.g., demographic groups) of participants with relevant experiences or identities and how these groups might trend differently in survey responses. Triangulating interview analyses with responses is another opportunity to analyze CI data.…”
Section: Review Of Cognitive Interviewingmentioning
confidence: 99%