2014
DOI: 10.1177/205684601411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Professions, marginality and inequalities

Abstract: Professional ideologies generally commit to addressing inequalities among clients and/or the public. Sociologists of professions in the Anglo-American context have written on the extent to which this commitment is honoured. This contribution, however, reviews the literature on inequalities between professional groups from a neo-Weberian perspective through the concept of marginality, focusing on the health context. With particular reference to the case of complementary and alternative medicine, it highlights t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current situation, public regulation has been unable to evolve according to changing contextual elements. In particular, no effective social protection tools have been introduced to respond to the social needs of the growing number of female professionals in the market, nor to sustain young workers in their early practice, exposing them to mechanisms of exploitation and processes of marginalization (Saks ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current situation, public regulation has been unable to evolve according to changing contextual elements. In particular, no effective social protection tools have been introduced to respond to the social needs of the growing number of female professionals in the market, nor to sustain young workers in their early practice, exposing them to mechanisms of exploitation and processes of marginalization (Saks ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%