2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proficiency in oocyte retrieval: how many procedures are necessary for training?

Abstract: Objective To determine a minimum number of procedures required for proficiency in oocyte retrieval and to characterize skill acquisition. Design Retrospective analysis. Setting Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility fellowship training program. Study subjects Fellows in training from 2005-2007 and 2008-2010. Interventions None. Main outcome measures Proficiency scores (PS) were calculated by dividing the number of oocytes retrieved by oocytes expected (PS=oocytes retrieved/expected). 2005-2007 tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these results contrast with the only study published about the learning curve of oocyte retrieval, which concluded that there was a short learning curve covering the first 10 retrievals, that oocyte retrieval was rapidly mastered by trainees and that there was no statistical difference in the learning curve between trainees (Goldman et al, 2011); however, the study was retrospective, whereas the LC-CUSUM enables a prospective monitoring of the learning process. The main outcome measure used by Goldman et al was a proficiency score calculated by dividing the number of oocytes retrieved by the oocytes expected defined by the number of follicles on the day of the human chorionic gonadotrophin trigger; in the current study, the number of oocytes collected was expressed as a ratio of the number of follicles ⩾14mm aspirated on the day of retrieval.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…However, these results contrast with the only study published about the learning curve of oocyte retrieval, which concluded that there was a short learning curve covering the first 10 retrievals, that oocyte retrieval was rapidly mastered by trainees and that there was no statistical difference in the learning curve between trainees (Goldman et al, 2011); however, the study was retrospective, whereas the LC-CUSUM enables a prospective monitoring of the learning process. The main outcome measure used by Goldman et al was a proficiency score calculated by dividing the number of oocytes retrieved by the oocytes expected defined by the number of follicles on the day of the human chorionic gonadotrophin trigger; in the current study, the number of oocytes collected was expressed as a ratio of the number of follicles ⩾14mm aspirated on the day of retrieval.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Experience is prerequisite in the various US practices. [23][24][25] In a study by Tammaa et al, investigators examined the learning curve for the detection of pouch of Douglas obliteration and DIE of the rectum among trainees familiar with the general use of TVUS. 26 Tammaa et al found that trainees could become proficient in the diagnosis of endometriosis after approximately 40 examinations.…”
Section: Comparison To Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One measure of the value of fellowship training in REI is the improvement in clinical outcomes that occur as a direct result of the research that is stimulated as part of the educational process leading to certification. Improvements in clinical outcomes for embryo transfer, sonohysterography, and oocyte retrieval have all been documented based on research performed in fellowship programs (6)(7)(8). It is likely that the establishment of a culture of improving clinical care based through research learned during training will carry over into clinical practice.…”
Section: Value Of Subspecialty Training and Certification In Reimentioning
confidence: 99%