Proficiency testing for the evaluation of the ability of European Union-National Reference laboratories to determine aflatoxin M₁in milk at levels corresponding to the new European Union legislation

Abstract

In 1992, the European Union set up a network of National Reference Laboratories and charged the Community Reference Laboratory with the responsibility to design a proficiency testing scheme for assessing the analytical ability of laboratories involved in the official control of aflatoxin M1 in milk. Since 1996, two exercises of proficiency testing have been performed on samples of milk powder and liquid milk at various levels of aflatoxin M1 contents. The trials were conducted according to ISO Guide 43, in particular for the homogeneity testing of sample batches and for the calculation of laboratory z-scores. The National Reference Laboratories officially designated by their governments participated in this programme. Samples were naturally-contaminated milk obtained by feeding cows with aflatoxin B1-contaminated feed. The levels of aflatoxin M1 in the samples ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 microg/kg in milk powder and from 0.05 to 0.07 microg/l in liquid milk. These levels were chosen as being close to the European Union-regulated limit of 0.05 microg of aflatoxin M1 per litre. The results produced by laboratories were compiled and statistically analysed to detect any outlying results and to calculate the individual z-scores. Except for one laboratory in each exercise, all laboratories exhibited acceptable or questionable z-scores. The interlaboratory relative standard deviation for reproducibility (RSDR) obtained for both 1996 and 1998 exercises were in the range 15.7-30.3%. Compared with other published studies, this indicates a very good precision for the performance of this laboratory network in the analysis of traces of aflatoxin M1 in milk.

Insights into Analytical Precision: Understanding the Factors Influencing Accurate Vitamin A Determination in Various Samples

“…Laboratories are required to actively conduct regular performance assessments and proficiency testing on animal feed, premixes, and biological samples to ensure the effectiveness of their analytical procedures and the competence of their staff [112][113][114]. These evaluations act as benchmarks, assessing the efficacy of current protocols and identifying areas that require refinement and adjustment.…”