2018
DOI: 10.21848/asr.2018.14.3.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proficiency, Use of Context and Non-Native Speech Perception in Noise Performance

Abstract: Purpose: The present study evaluated a novel method of quantifying relative use of bottom-up and top-down processing when perceiving speech in challenging listening conditions. Methods: One-hundred seven normal-hearing adults participated as listeners. Fortyseven were Spanish-speaking, second-language learners of English (L2) and 60 were monolingual speakers of English. Using adaptive procedure, signal-to-noise ratios required for 70%-correct recognition of words and sentences (SNR70) were obtained for all lis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SNR70 values for children with referral were compared to those for typically-developing peers. Based on the previous results that English-speaking adults require lower SNR70s for sentences than for words possibly due to the benefit of sentence context (Nishi, 2018), it was hypothesized that similar context benefit would be observed for children if they could effectively use sentence context. It was further hypothesized that, if the burden of having difficulty with acousticphonetic cue processing causes a breakdown in context-independent processing of speech for children with referral, and their context-dependent processing is also compromised, then their SNR70 for sentences would be elevated (indicating poorer performance) compared to word SNR70.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…SNR70 values for children with referral were compared to those for typically-developing peers. Based on the previous results that English-speaking adults require lower SNR70s for sentences than for words possibly due to the benefit of sentence context (Nishi, 2018), it was hypothesized that similar context benefit would be observed for children if they could effectively use sentence context. It was further hypothesized that, if the burden of having difficulty with acousticphonetic cue processing causes a breakdown in context-independent processing of speech for children with referral, and their context-dependent processing is also compromised, then their SNR70 for sentences would be elevated (indicating poorer performance) compared to word SNR70.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech stimuli were the same as those used by Nishi (2018). Briefly, they were words from the Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten (PBK) test (Haskins, 1949) and the sentences from the Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) Standard Sentence Test (Bench & Bamford, 1979).…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations