2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00946.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile-Likelihood Inference for Highly Accurate Diagnostic Tests

Abstract: We consider profile-likelihood inference based on the multinomial distribution for assessing the accuracy of a diagnostic test. The methods apply to ordinal rating data when accuracy is assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Simulation results suggest that the derived confidence intervals have acceptable coverage probabilities, even when sample sizes are small and the diagnostic tests have high accuracies. The methods extend to stratified settings and situations in whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, we assume that δ 1 =δ 2 = … δ L =δ, where δ l denotes the AUC for the l th institution. This is the same assumption made in Tsimikas et al (2002) when the response of a diagnostic test is categorical (ordinal rating).…”
Section: El Intervals For Auc With Stratified Samplesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, we assume that δ 1 =δ 2 = … δ L =δ, where δ l denotes the AUC for the l th institution. This is the same assumption made in Tsimikas et al (2002) when the response of a diagnostic test is categorical (ordinal rating).…”
Section: El Intervals For Auc With Stratified Samplesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our proposed method is an additional contribution for constructing a confidence interval for the AUC of a highly accurate diagnostic test. When the response of a diagnostic test is ordinal, Tsimikas et al (2002) proposed a profile likelihood method for constructing such an interval. However, their method cannot be applied when the response of the test is continuous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we partially compare the stated confidence intervals with an empirical likelihood (EL) approach proposed by Qin and Zhou () and recommended in Qin and Hotilovac (), as well as a profile likelihood approach found in Tsimikas et al. () . Thus, 11 different computation methods will be compared.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the profile likelihood method of Tsimikas et al. () has been developed for very large AUC values close to 1 and seems to be the method of choice in such situation with discrete data.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation