ajhissues 2017
DOI: 10.26875/ajhi112017iii
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile of delivering mothers in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We recorded an overall prevalence of 0.49%. This frequency is comparable to that recently reported in Lubumbashi (DRC) by Kakudji, et al [8] which was 0.41%. It seems to be higher than that reported in 1994 in Nyankunde (in the north east part of the DRC) by Ahuka, et al (0.35%) [10].…”
Section: Prevalencesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We recorded an overall prevalence of 0.49%. This frequency is comparable to that recently reported in Lubumbashi (DRC) by Kakudji, et al [8] which was 0.41%. It seems to be higher than that reported in 1994 in Nyankunde (in the north east part of the DRC) by Ahuka, et al (0.35%) [10].…”
Section: Prevalencesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This high frequency of uterine ruptures in developing countries is probably linked to lack of equipment, low number of quali ied and trained caregivers in obstetric and neonatal emergency care in maternities and high number of makeshift maternities (where diagnosis, management and timely referral of obstetric emergencies remain a serious problem) which are constantly emerging in some large African cities. To these are added the problem of lack of ANC visits in our settings where less than 30% of pregnant women reach 4 or more ANC [8,23].…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found a frequency of delivery of primiparous women of 31.8%. This is higher than the 19.9% proportion reported in a similar study done in an urban setting, Lubumbashi, by Kakudji et al [9] and may suggest a lower fecundity for our target population.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%